+ " map in that class.");
    }
    Object result;
    try {
      result = supplier.get();
    } catch (Throwable t) {
      if (predicate.apply(t)) {
        // We are careful to set up INSTANCE_OF to match each Predicate to its target Class.
        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
        T caught = (T) t;
        return caught;
      }
      throw new AssertionError(

              + " map in that class.");
    }
    Object result;
    try {
      result = supplier.get();
    } catch (Throwable t) {
      if (predicate.apply(t)) {
        // We are careful to set up INSTANCE_OF to match each Predicate to its target Class.
        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
        T caught = (T) t;
        return caught;
      }
      throw new AssertionError(

if(!le.radioValue&&"radio"===t&&fe(e,"input")){var n=e.value;return e.setAttribute("type",t),n&&(e.value=n),t}}}},removeAttr:function(e,t){var n,r=0,i=t&&t.match(D);if(i&&1===e.nodeType)while(n=i[r++])e.removeAttribute(n)}}),mt={set:function(e,t,n){return!1===t?ce.removeAttr(e,n):e.setAttribute(n,n),n}},ce.each(ce.expr.match.bool.source.match(/\w+/g),function(e,t){var a=xt[t]||ce.find.attr;xt[t]=function(e,t,n){var r,i,o=t.toLowerCase();return n||(i=xt[o],xt[o]=r,r=null!=a(e,t,n)?o:null,xt[o]=i),r}});var...

                if (propValue.startsWith("!")) {
                    reverseValue = true;
                    propValue = propValue.substring(1);
                }

                // we have a value, so it has to match the system value...
                boolean result = propValue.equals(sysValue);

                if (reverseValue) {
                    return !result;
                } else {
                    return result;

## Version 4.4.1

_2020-03-08_

 *  Fix: Don't reuse a connection on redirect if certs match but DNS does not. For better
    locality and performance OkHttp attempts to use the same pooled connection across redirects and
    follow-ups. It independently shares connections when the IP addresses and certificates match,
    even if the host names do not. In 4.4.0 we introduced a regression where we shared a connection

      constructor = type.getConstructor();
    } catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
      return arbitraryConstantInstanceOrNull(type);
    }
    constructor.setAccessible(true); // accessibility check is too slow
    try {
      return constructor.newInstance();
    } catch (InstantiationException | IllegalAccessException impossible) {
      throw new AssertionError(impossible);
    } catch (InvocationTargetException e) {

                return false;
            }
            if (!matcher.matches(requirement.getValue())) {
                getLog().debug("Toolchain {} doesn't match required property: {}", this, key);
                return false;
            }
        }
        return true;
    }

    protected Logger getLog() {
        return logger;
    }

    @Override

        Encdec.enc_uint64le(currentDate.getTime(), buffer, 0);
        long decoded = Encdec.dec_uint64le(buffer, 0);

        // Then
        assertEquals(currentDate.getTime(), decoded, "Encoded and decoded time should match");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should encode and decode UUIDs")
    void testUUIDOperations() {
        // Given

		t.Fatalf("Failed, got error: %v", err)
	}

	if result.ID != user.ID {
		t.Fatalf("result's id, %d, doesn't match user's id, %d", result.ID, user.ID)
	}
	// should find company
	if result.Company.ID != *user.CompanyID {
		t.Fatalf("result's id, %d, doesn't match user's company id, %d", result.Company.ID, *user.CompanyID)
	}
}

func TestJoinWithSoftDeleted(t *testing.T) {

 * and access mask are considered. If the ACE is a "deny"
 * ACE and <i>any</i> of the desired access bits match bits in the access
 * mask of the ACE, the whole access check fails. If the ACE is an "allow"
 * ACE and <i>all</i> of the bits in the desired access bits match bits in
 * the access mask of the ACE, the access check is successful. Otherwise,
 * more ACEs are evaluated until all desired access bits (combined)