}

			if totalGet < throughputHighestGet {
				// Following check is for situations
				// when Writes() scale higher than Reads()
				// - practically speaking this never happens
				// and should never happen - however it has
				// been seen recently due to hardware issues
				// causes Reads() to go slower than Writes().
				//
				// Send such results anyways as this shall
				// expose a problem underneath.

 *       OptionalLong} and {@code OptionalDouble}, the use of which is recommended; Guava does not
 *       have these.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p><b>There are no plans to deprecate this class in the foreseeable future.</b> However, we do
 * gently recommend that you prefer the new, standard Java class whenever possible.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a

   *
   * <p>The resulting multiset's iterators, and those of its {@code entrySet()} and {@code
   * elementSet()}, do not support {@code remove()}. However, all other multiset methods supported
   * by {@code unfiltered} are supported by the returned multiset. When given an element that
   * doesn't satisfy the predicate, the multiset's {@code add()} and {@code addAll()} methods throw

   *
   * <p>The resulting multiset's iterators, and those of its {@code entrySet()} and {@code
   * elementSet()}, do not support {@code remove()}. However, all other multiset methods supported
   * by {@code unfiltered} are supported by the returned multiset. When given an element that
   * doesn't satisfy the predicate, the multiset's {@code add()} and {@code addAll()} methods throw

        }
      }
      mappings.put(var, arg);
    }
  }

  // This is needed when resolving types against a context with wildcards
  // For example:
  // class Holder<T> {
  //   void set(T data) {...}
  // }
  // Holder<List<?>> should *not* resolve the set() method to set(List<?> data).
  // Instead, it should create a capture of the wildcard so that set() rejects any List<T>.

   * such as:
   *
   * - Make checkOpen return the non-null `seq`. Then callers can assign that to a local variable or
   *   even back to `this.seq`. However, that may suggest that we're defending against concurrent
   *   mutation, which is not an actual risk because we use `synchronized`.
   * - Make `remaining` require a non-null `seq` argument. But this is a bit weird because the

   * such as:
   *
   * - Make checkOpen return the non-null `seq`. Then callers can assign that to a local variable or
   *   even back to `this.seq`. However, that may suggest that we're defending against concurrent
   *   mutation, which is not an actual risk because we use `synchronized`.
   * - Make `remaining` require a non-null `seq` argument. But this is a bit weird because the

   * @param length the length of the new array
   */
  /*
   * The new array contains nulls, even if the old array did not. If we wanted to be accurate, we
   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of
   * ObjectArrays, which is the main caller of this method.)
   */

   * @param length the length of the new array
   */
  /*
   * The new array contains nulls, even if the old array did not. If we wanted to be accurate, we
   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of
   * ObjectArrays, which is the main caller of this method.)
   */

 *
 * <p>Occasionally, an API will return a plain {@code Future} and it will be impossible to change
 * the return type. For this case, we provide a more expensive workaround in {@code
 * JdkFutureAdapters}. However, when possible, it is more efficient and reliable to create a {@code
 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @since 1.0
 */
/*