Set<Feature<?>> multimapFeatures) {
    Set<Feature<?>> derivedFeatures = copyToSet(multimapFeatures);
    derivedFeatures.remove(CollectionFeature.SERIALIZABLE);
    derivedFeatures.remove(CollectionFeature.SERIALIZABLE_INCLUDING_VIEWS);
    return derivedFeatures;
  }

  private static Set<Feature<?>> computeAsMapFeatures(Set<Feature<?>> multimapFeatures) {
    Set<Feature<?>> derivedFeatures = copyToSet(multimapFeatures);

func commonSetDriveCount(divisibleSize uint64, setCounts []uint64) (setSize uint64) {
	// prefers setCounts to be sorted for optimal behavior.
	if divisibleSize < setCounts[len(setCounts)-1] {
		return divisibleSize
	}

	// Figure out largest value of total_drives_in_erasure_set which results
	// in least number of total_drives/total_drives_erasure_set ratio.
	prevD := divisibleSize / setCounts[0]
	for _, cnt := range setCounts {

  static final OtherThrowable OTHER_THROWABLE = new OtherThrowable();
  static final Future<String> FAILED_FUTURE_OTHER_THROWABLE =
      immediateFailedFuture(OTHER_THROWABLE);
  static final Error ERROR = new Error("mymessage");
  static final Future<String> FAILED_FUTURE_ERROR = immediateFailedFuture(ERROR);
  static final Future<String> RUNTIME_EXCEPTION_FUTURE =
      UncheckedThrowingFuture.throwingRuntimeException(RUNTIME_EXCEPTION);

## How to test this PR?


## Types of changes
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Optimization (provides speedup with no functional changes)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

## Checklist:
- [ ] Fixes a regression (If yes, please add `commit-id` or `PR #` here)

  }

  /**
   * Returns a new {@code Future} whose result is asynchronously derived from the result of this
   * {@code Future}. If the input {@code Future} fails, the returned {@code Future} fails with the
   * same exception (and the function is not invoked).
   *
   * <p>More precisely, the returned {@code Future} takes its result from a {@code Future} produced

name: Feature Addition Request
description: I want to add a new feature
labels: ["type=addition"]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Filing feature requests is one of the most popular ways to contribute to Guava.


        Be aware, though: most feature requests are not accepted, even if they're suggested by
        a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our

  REMOVE_OPERATIONS(CollectionFeature.REMOVE_OPERATIONS, SUPPORTS_REMOVE_WITH_INDEX);

  private final Set<Feature<? super List>> implied;

  ListFeature(Feature<? super List>... implied) {
    this.implied = copyToSet(implied);
  }

  @Override
  public Set<Feature<? super List>> getImpliedFeatures() {
    return implied;
  }

  @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
  @Inherited

       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

    @SuppressWarnings("unused")

 * if it is present on the connection spec. The same policy also applies to cipher suites.
 *
 * Use [Builder.allEnabledTlsVersions] and [Builder.allEnabledCipherSuites] to defer all feature
 * selection to the underlying SSL socket.
 *
 * The configuration of each spec changes with each OkHttp release. This is annoying: upgrading

    testers.add(MultisetIteratorTester.class);
    testers.add(MultisetSerializationTester.class);
    return testers;
  }

  private static Set<Feature<?>> computeEntrySetFeatures(Set<Feature<?>> features) {
    Set<Feature<?>> derivedFeatures = new HashSet<>(features);
    derivedFeatures.remove(CollectionFeature.GENERAL_PURPOSE);
    derivedFeatures.remove(CollectionFeature.SUPPORTS_ADD);