</h1>
                    </div>
                    <div class="col-sm-6">
                        <ol class="breadcrumb float-sm-right">
                            <li class="breadcrumb-item"><la:link href="/admin/badword">
                                <la:message key="labels.bad_word_link_list"/>
                            </la:link></li>

                            <la:message key="labels.dict_kuromoji_title"/>
                        </h1>
                    </div>
                    <div class="col-sm-6">
                        <ol class="breadcrumb float-sm-right">
                            <li class="breadcrumb-item"><la:link href="/admin/dict">
                                <la:message key="labels.dict_list_link"/>
                            </la:link></li>

In version 0.121.0, FastAPI added support for `Depends(scope="function")` for dependencies with `yield`.

Using `Depends(scope="function")`, the exit code after `yield` is executed right after the *path operation function* is finished, before the response is sent back to the client.

And when using `Depends(scope="request")` (the default), the exit code after `yield` is executed after the response is sent.

   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.
   * (And even if annotations on local variables were permitted as an optional hint, no annotation
   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying
   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as

   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.
   * (And even if annotations on local variables were permitted as an optional hint, no annotation
   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying
   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as

 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in
response to any instances of unacceptable behavior, in compliance with the
licensing terms applying to the Project developments.

Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or
reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions
that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or

EOF

  license_query "attr('licenses', 'notice', deps($BUILD_TARGET))" > $BATS_TEST_TMPDIR/expected_licenses
  license_query "deps($LICENSES_TARGET)" > $BATS_TEST_TMPDIR/actual_licenses

  # Column 1 is left only, Column 2 is right only, Column 3 is shared lines
  # Select lines unique to actual_licenses, i.e. extra licenses.

// -- if input is RRS but RRS is not configured/initialized '-1' parity
//
//	for RRS is assumed, the caller is expected to choose the right parity
//	at that point.
//
// -- if input is STANDARD but STANDARD is not configured/initialized '-1' parity
//
//	is returned, the caller is expected to choose the right parity
//	at that point.
func (sCfg *Config) GetParityForSC(sc string) (parity int) {
	ConfigLock.RLock()

                            <la:message key="labels.dict_mapping_title"/>
                        </h1>
                    </div>
                    <div class="col-sm-6">
                        <ol class="breadcrumb float-sm-right">
                            <li class="breadcrumb-item"><la:link href="/admin/dict">
                                <la:message key="labels.dict_list_link"/>
                            </la:link></li>