* they end up depending on <i>other</i> existing poor-quality {@code hashCode} implementations,
 * including those in many JDK classes.
 *
 * <p>{@code Object.hashCode} implementations tend to be very fast, but have weak collision
 * prevention and <i>no</i> expectation of bit dispersion. This leaves them perfectly suitable for

   *
   * <p>For example,
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code [2, 4)} and {@code [5, 7)} are not connected
   *   <li>{@code [2, 4)} and {@code [3, 5)} are connected, because both enclose {@code [3, 4)}
   *   <li>{@code [2, 4)} and {@code [4, 6)} are connected, because both enclose the empty range
   *       {@code [4, 4)}
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Note that this range and {@code other} have a well-defined {@linkplain #span union} and

                <artifactId>error_prone_core</artifactId>
                <version>2.33.0</version>
              </path>
            </annotationProcessorPaths>
            <!-- Fork because we need args like add-exports. (But see the TODO above about .mvn/jvm.config.) -->
            <fork>true</fork>
          </configuration>
        </plugin>
        <plugin>
          <groupId>org.mvnsearch</groupId>

                <artifactId>error_prone_core</artifactId>
                <version>2.33.0</version>
              </path>
            </annotationProcessorPaths>
            <!-- Fork because we need args like add-exports. (But see the TODO above about .mvn/jvm.config.) -->
            <fork>true</fork>
          </configuration>
        </plugin>
        <plugin>
          <groupId>org.mvnsearch</groupId>

      if (options.length == 0) {
        // If no OpenOptions were passed, delegate to Files.lines, which could have performance
        // advantages. (If OpenOptions were passed we can't, because Files.lines doesn't have an
        // overload taking OpenOptions, meaning we can't guarantee the same behavior w.r.t. things
        // like following/not following symlinks.)
        return new AsCharSource(charset) {

      if (options.length == 0) {
        // If no OpenOptions were passed, delegate to Files.lines, which could have performance
        // advantages. (If OpenOptions were passed we can't, because Files.lines doesn't have an
        // overload taking OpenOptions, meaning we can't guarantee the same behavior w.r.t. things
        // like following/not following symlinks.)
        return new AsCharSource(charset) {

   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,
   * there's no way to assign a {@code @Nullable T} to a field {@code T foo;} and instruct the

    public Set<Feature<? super @Nullable Void>> getImpliedFeatures() {
      return emptySet();
    }
  }

  /**
   * Creates a suite whose map has some elements filtered out of view.
   *
   * <p>Because the map may be ascending or descending, this test must derive the relative order of
   * these extreme values rather than relying on their regular sort ordering.
   */
  final TestSuite createSubmapSuite(

  protected Queue<String> create() {
    TestQueue<String> inner = new TestQueue<>();
    Queue<String> outer = Synchronized.queue(inner, inner.mutex);
    outer.add("foo"); // necessary because we try to remove elements later on
    return outer;
  }

  private static final class TestQueue<E> implements Queue<E> {
    private final Queue<E> delegate = Lists.newLinkedList();

   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,
   * there's no way to assign a {@code @Nullable T} to a field {@code T foo;} and instruct the