// throwables or completion values.
            newFuture.setFuture(oldFuture);
          } else if (outputFuture.isCancelled() && taskExecutor.trySetCancelled()) {
            // If this CAS succeeds, we know that the provided callable will never be invoked,
            // so when oldFuture completes it is safe to allow the next submitted task to

#### Key rotation - Basic Operation

The MinIO server supports key rotation for SSE-S3 encrypted objects. The minio server decrypts the OEK using the current encrypted data key and the master key ID of the object metadata. If this succeeds, the server requests a new data key from the KMS using the master key ID of the **current MinIO KMS configuration** and re-wraps the *OEK* with a new *KEK* derived from the new data key / EK:

##### Figure 3 - KMS data key rotation

   * of this queue less the current {@code size} of this queue.
   *
   * <p>Note that you cannot always tell if an attempt to insert an element will succeed by
   * inspecting {@code remainingCapacity} because it may be the case that another thread is about to
   * insert or remove an element.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override
  public int remainingCapacity() {

	}
	for _, fname := range filenames {
		if fname == "-" {
			if w := warningsByFilename[fname]; w != nil {
				_, _ = fmt.Fprint(writer, warningToString(w))
			} else {
				_, _ = fmt.Fprintf(writer, "validation succeed\n")
			}
			break
		}

		if w := warningsByFilename[fname]; w != nil {
			_, _ = fmt.Fprintf(writer, "%q has warnings: %v\n", fname, warningToString(w))
		} else {

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li><b>collision-resistant:</b> while the definition above requires making at least <i>some</i>
 *       token attempt, one measure of the quality of a hash function is <i>how well</i> it succeeds
 *       at this goal. Important note: it may be easy to achieve the theoretical minimum collision
 *       rate when using completely <i>random</i> sample input. The true test of a hash function is

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li><b>collision-resistant:</b> while the definition above requires making at least <i>some</i>
 *       token attempt, one measure of the quality of a hash function is <i>how well</i> it succeeds
 *       at this goal. Important note: it may be easy to achieve the theoretical minimum collision
 *       rate when using completely <i>random</i> sample input. The true test of a hash function is

        // that happens, then we will have buffered bytes that are needed by the SSLSocket!
        // This check is imperfect: it doesn't tell us whether a handshake will succeed, just
        // that it will almost certainly fail because the proxy has sent unexpected data.
        if (source?.buffer?.exhausted() == false || sink?.buffer?.exhausted() == false) {

  ASSERT_EQ(TF_OK, TF_GetCode(status)) << TF_Message(status);

  // The device of var_handle0 is local device which is the same before and
  // after cluster update. Remove resource with valid device should succeed.
  TFE_Op* op = TFE_NewOp(ctx, "DestroyResourceOp", status);
  ASSERT_EQ(TF_OK, TF_GetCode(status)) << TF_Message(status);
  TFE_OpAddInput(op, var_handle0, status);
  TFE_OpSetDevice(op, dev0_name, status);

 *
 * <h3>Warning about performance</h3>
 *
 * <p>Remember that parameter values for message construction must all be computed eagerly, and
 * autoboxing and varargs array creation may happen as well, even when the verification succeeds and
 * the message ends up unneeded. Performance-sensitive verification checks should continue to use
 * usual form:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * Bill bill = remoteService.getLastUnpaidBill();

 *
 * <h3>Warning about performance</h3>
 *
 * <p>Remember that parameter values for message construction must all be computed eagerly, and
 * autoboxing and varargs array creation may happen as well, even when the verification succeeds and
 * the message ends up unneeded. Performance-sensitive verification checks should continue to use
 * usual form:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * Bill bill = remoteService.getLastUnpaidBill();