También, el mejor enfoque era usar estándares ya existentes.

Entonces, antes de siquiera empezar a programar **FastAPI**, pasé varios meses estudiando las especificaciones de OpenAPI, JSON Schema, OAuth2, etc. Entendiendo su relación, superposición y diferencias.

## Diseño

Luego pasé algún tiempo diseñando la "API" de desarrollador que quería tener como usuario (como desarrollador usando FastAPI).

Also, the best approach was to use already existing standards.

So, before even starting to code **FastAPI**, I spent several months studying the specs for OpenAPI, JSON Schema, OAuth2, etc. Understanding their relationship, overlap, and differences.

## Design { #design }

Then I spent some time designing the developer "API" I wanted to have as a user (as a developer using FastAPI).

        * У відповідях, `set` буде перетворений на `list`.
        * Згенерована схема буде вказувати, що значення `set` є унікальними (з використанням JSON Schema's `uniqueItems`).
* `bytes`:
    * Стандартний Пайтонівський `bytes`.
    * У запитах і відповідях це буде оброблено як `str`.
    * Згенерована схема буде вказувати, що це `str` з "форматом" `binary`.
* `Decimal`:

/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/logs/fess*
/.settings/
.project
.classpath
*.iml
.idea
.vscode
.DS_Store
/plugins/
/modules/
/tomcat.8080/
dbflute_fess/output/doc/lastadoc-fess.html
dbflute_fess/schema/project-lastadoc-fess.json
src/main/resources/fess_indices/fess_config.access_token/access_token.bulk
src/main/resources/ga_client_secrets.p12
src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/project.properties
/.apt_generated/
/.apt_generated_tests/

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<eef>
	<config Schema="2.0" EnterpriseVersion="'7.6.50'">
		<collections Count="3">
			<collection Name="fess">
				<bad_urls><![CDATA[
https://fess.codelibs.org/images/
              ]]></bad_urls>
				<good_urls><![CDATA[
https://fess.codelibs.org/
https://www.codelibs.org/
              ]]></good_urls>
				<prerequisite_results><![CDATA[
20
              ]]></prerequisite_results>

	default:
		return nil, errors.New("insufficient parameters for S3 backend authentication")
	}
	opts := &minio.Options{
		Creds:     creds,
		Secure:    u.Scheme == "https",
		Transport: globalRemoteTargetTransport,
		Region:    conf.Region,
	}
	client, err := minio.New(u.Host, opts)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}

package schema

import (
	"crypto/sha1"
	"encoding/hex"
	"regexp"
	"strings"
	"unicode/utf8"

	"github.com/jinzhu/inflection"
	"golang.org/x/text/cases"
	"golang.org/x/text/language"
)

// Namer namer interface
type Namer interface {
	TableName(table string) string
	SchemaName(table string) string
	ColumnName(table, column string) string
	JoinTableName(joinTable string) string
	RelationshipFKName(Relationship) string

Ayrıca, en iyi yaklaşım zaten mevcut olan standartları kullanmaktı.

Sonuç olarak, **FastAPI**'ı kodlamaya başlamadan önce, birkaç ay boyunca OpenAPI, JSON Schema, OAuth2 ve benzerlerinin tanımlamalarını inceledim. İlişkilerini, örtüştükleri noktaları ve farklılıklarını anlamaya çalıştım.

## Tasarım

#  limitations under the License.
#

# https://docs.github.com/en/communities/using-templates-to-encourage-useful-issues-and-pull-requests/syntax-for-githubs-form-schema

name: Feature request
description: File a proposal for new feature, improvement
labels: ["enhancement"]

body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |

* مستندسازی خودکار data model با <a href="https://json-schema.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank"><strong>JSON Schema</strong></a> (همانطور که OpenAPI خود نیز مبتنی بر JSON Schema است).
* طراحی شده بر اساس استاندارد هایی که پس از یک مطالعه دقیق بدست آمده اند بجای طرحی ناپخته و بدون فکر.