- The test is intended to verify pod scheduling with an anti-affinity scenario, but it uses the wrong pod template. 
  This affects functional correctness. ([#134262](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/134262), [@sats-23](https://github.com/sats-23)) [SIG Testing]

## Dependencies

* [GCE] Enable by default audit logging truncating backend. ([#68288](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/68288), [@loburm](https://github.com/loburm))
* kubeadm: fix a possible scenario where kubeadm can pull much newer control-plane images ([#69301](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/69301), [@neolit123](https://github.com/neolit123))

- The scheduling queue didn't notice any extenders' failures, it could miss some cluster events,
  and it could end up Pods rejected by Extenders stuck in unschedulable pod pool in 5min in the worst-case scenario.
  Now, the scheduling queue notices extenders' failures and requeue Pods rejected by Extenders appropriately. ([#122043](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/122043), [@sanposhiho](https://github.com/sanposhiho)) [SIG Scheduling]