}

                private BuilderProblem toProblem(ModelProblem problem) {
                    return new BuilderProblem() {
                        @Override
                        public String getSource() {
                            return problem.getSource();
                        }

                        @Override

Here's what to keep in mind and how to review a pull request:

### Understand the problem { #understand-the-problem }

* First, make sure you **understand the problem** that the pull request is trying to solve. It might have a longer discussion in a GitHub Discussion or issue.

* There's also a good chance that the pull request is not actually needed because the problem can be solved in a **different way**. Then you can suggest or ask about that.

  * Upgrade Node Problem Detector to v0.4.1. New features added:

    * Add /dev/kmsg support for kernel log parsing. ([#112](https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/pull/112), [@euank](https://github.com/euank))

    * Add ABRT support. ([#105](https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/pull/105), [@juliusmilan](https://github.com/juliusmilan))

- The `kubelet` now reports distinguishes log messages about certificate rotation for its client cert and server cert separately to make debugging problems with one or the other easier. ([#101252](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/101252), [@smarterclayton](https://github.com/smarterclayton))

        - Typo (please open a PR instead)
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: description
    attributes:
      label: Problem description
      description: |
        Please describe the problem as concisely as possible.
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context (optional)
      description: |

        Provide a [minimal, self-contained example](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimal_reproducible_example) project demonstrating the problem as a GitHub repository or an attached archive.
        You can use [the template](https://github.com/gradle/gradle-issue-reproducer) with a Gradle GitHub action set up to showcase your problem.
        In the rare cases where this is infeasible, we will also accept a detailed set of instructions.

  when {
    // If there was a protocol problem, don't recover.
    e is ProtocolException -> false

    // If there was an interruption or timeout (SocketTimeoutException), don't recover.
    // For the socket connect timeout case we do not try the same host with a different
    // ConnectionSpec: we assume it is unreachable.
    e is InterruptedIOException -> false

---
name: Bug report
about: A reproducible problem
title: ''
labels: bug
assignees: ''

---

Good bug reports include a failing test! Writing a test helps you to isolate and describe the problem, and it helps us to fix it fast. Bug reports without a failing test or reproduction steps are likely to be closed.

Here’s an example test to get you started.

        - Deprecation
        - Refactoring
        - Other
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: description
    attributes:
      label: Problem description
      description: |
        Please describe the problem as concisely as possible.
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context (optional)
      description: |

Provide a reproducible test case that is the bare minimum necessary to generate
the problem. If possible, please share a link to Colab/Jupyter/any notebook.

Also, please include a link to a GraphDef or the model if possible.

**Any other info / logs**

Include any logs or source code that would be helpful to diagnose the problem.
If including tracebacks, please include the full traceback. Large logs and files