default:
		uv, err = uuid.Parse(fi.VersionID)
		if err != nil {
			return err
		}
	}

	for i, version := range x.versions {
		if version.header.VersionID != uv || version.header.Type != ObjectType {
			continue
		}
		// if uv has tiered content we add a
		// free-version to track it for asynchronous
		// deletion via scanner.
		ver, err := x.getIdx(i)
		if err != nil {
			return err
		}

				Error:  ctx.Err().Error(),
				Number: partNumber,
			}
			continue
		}

		if err := Access(pathJoin(volumeDir, pathutil.Dir(partMetaPath), fmt.Sprintf("part.%d", partNumber))); err != nil {
			parts[idx] = &ObjectPartInfo{
				Error:  err.Error(),
				Number: partNumber,
			}
			continue
		}

                if (Modifier.isStatic(field.getModifiers()) || field.isSynthetic()) {
                    continue;
                }

                try {
                    field.setAccessible(true);
                    Object value = field.get(node);
                    if (value == null) {
                        continue;
                    }

                    String fullPath = currentPath + "/" + field.getName();

                    if (StringUtil.isEmpty(username)) {
                        logger.warn("username is empty. fileAuth:{}", fileAuthName);
                        continue;
                    }

                    final SmbAuthentication smbAuth = new SmbAuthentication();
                    smbAuth.setDomain(domain == null ? StringUtil.EMPTY : domain);

  * Not all "remote" repositories will fail. Specifically, if the remote
    repo uses the file:// protocol, and it doesn't refer to a shared
    filesystem, it will continue to be available.

  The question remaining is: Which level of offline mode will we support? It
  seems reasonable to assume that users will be able to tell when localhost is

        assertNotNull(result.getContent());
        assertFalse(result.getContent().isEmpty());
    }

    /**
     * Test that ZipExtractor handles mixed valid and invalid entries gracefully.
     * Should continue processing valid entries even when some fail.
     */
    public void test_ZipExtractor_mixedEntries_continuesProcessing() throws IOException {
        // Create a ZIP with one valid text file

	logger.FatalIf(err, "Unable to get IP addresses of this host")

	for _, interf := range ifs {
		addrs, err := interf.Addrs()
		if err != nil {
			continue
		}
		if runtime.GOOS == "windows" && interf.Flags&net.FlagUp == 0 {
			continue
		}

		for _, addr := range addrs {
			var ip net.IP
			switch v := addr.(type) {
			case *net.IPNet:
				ip = v.IP
			case *net.IPAddr:
				ip = v.IP
			}

Calls are executed in one of two ways:

 * **Synchronous:** your thread blocks until the response is readable.

    #
    #; isLoggingReplaceSql = true
    # - - - - - - - - - -/

    # /- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    # o isErrorSqlContinue: (NotRequired - Default false)
    #  Does it continue the task when error SQL exists?
    #
    #; isErrorSqlContinue = false
    # - - - - - - - - - -/

    # /- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

	for x := range hosts {
		should := 0
		for y := range hosts {
			if x == y {
				continue
			}
			c.Local = hosts[x]
			c.Remote = hosts[y]
			cReverse.Local = hosts[y]
			cReverse.Remote = hosts[x]
			if c.shouldConnect() == cReverse.shouldConnect() {