* invoke methods, they invoke methods on the {@code ForwardingBlockingDeque}.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods are not guaranteed to be thread-safe, even when all of the
 * methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Emily Soldal
 * @since 21.0 (since 14.0 as {@link com.google.common.collect.ForwardingBlockingDeque})
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible

   * of their elements."
   *
   * </blockquote>
   */
  RESTRICTS_ELEMENTS,

  /**
   * Indicates that a collection has a well-defined ordering of its elements. The ordering may
   * depend on the element values, such as a {@link SortedSet}, or on the insertion ordering, such
   * as a {@link LinkedHashSet}. All list tests and sorted-collection tests automatically specify
   * this feature.
   */
  KNOWN_ORDER,

 * comparator is not consistent with {@code equals}.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods are not guaranteed to be thread-safe, even when all of the
 * methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Mike Bostock
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @since 2.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
public abstract class ForwardingMapEntry<K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>

 * invoke methods, they invoke methods on the {@code ForwardingBlockingDeque}.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods are not guaranteed to be thread-safe, even when all of the
 * methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Emily Soldal
 * @since 14.0
 * @deprecated This class has moved to {@code com.google.common.util.concurrent}. Please use {@link

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

      </plugin>
      <plugin>
        <artifactId>maven-jar-plugin</artifactId>
        <configuration>
          <excludes>
            <!-- 2. Don't include the source in the jar (since that would let users depend on it from GWT client code, which is compiled from source). -->
            <exclude>**/ForceGuavaCompilation*</exclude>
            <exclude>**/DummyJavadocClass*</exclude>
          </excludes>
        </configuration>

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getSetNullSupportedMethod() {

 * comparator is not consistent with {@code equals}.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods are not guaranteed to be thread-safe, even when all of the
 * methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Mike Bostock
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @since 2.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
public abstract class ForwardingMapEntry<K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>

 * invoke methods, they invoke methods on the {@code ForwardingBlockingDeque}.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods are not guaranteed to be thread-safe, even when all of the
 * methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Emily Soldal
 * @since 14.0
 * @deprecated This class has moved to {@code com.google.common.util.concurrent}. Please use {@link