import java.util.EnumSet;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import java.util.Set;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;

/**
 * Creates, based on your criteria, a JUnit test suite that exhaustively tests a {@code
 * ListMultimap} implementation.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtIncompatible
public class ListMultimapTestSuiteBuilder<K, V>

import java.util.Map.Entry;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Tester for {@code Multimap.entries}.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore // Affects only Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class MultimapEntriesTester<K, V> extends AbstractMultimapTester<K, V, Multimap<K, V>> {
  public void testEntries() {

        assertThat(value.toString(radix)).isEqualTo(value.bigIntegerValue().toString(radix));
      }
    }
  }

  @AndroidIncompatible // b/28251030, re-enable when the fix is everywhere we run this test
  public void testFloatValue() {
    for (long value : TEST_LONGS) {
      UnsignedLong unsignedValue = UnsignedLong.fromLongBits(value);
      assertWithMessage("Float value of " + unsignedValue)

    assertThrows(IndexOutOfBoundsException.class, () -> sink.putBytes(new byte[8], 0, 16));
    assertThrows(IndexOutOfBoundsException.class, () -> sink.putBytes(new byte[8], 0, -1));
  }

  /**
   * This test creates a long random sequence of inputs, then a lot of differently configured sinks
   * process it; all should produce the same answer, the only difference should be the number of

import java.util.Map.Entry;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.regex.Matcher;
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
import junit.framework.Test;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * Tests for {@link ImmutableMap}.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @author Jesse Wilson
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)

<div style="text-align: right; margin-right: 10%;">Kabir Khan - <strong>Microsoft</strong> <a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pull/26" target="_blank"><small>(ref)</small></a></div>

---

"_A gba àwọn ohun èlò ìwé afọwọkọ **FastAPI** tí kò yí padà láti ṣẹ̀dá olùpín **REST** tí a lè béèrè lọ́wọ́ rẹ̀ láti gba **àsọtẹ́lẹ̀**. [fún Ludwig]_"

---

<div style="text-align: left; direction: ltr;">"We adopted the <strong>FastAPI</strong> library to spawn a <strong>REST</strong>server that can be queried to obtain <strong>predictions</strong>. [for Ludwig]"</div>

    }
  }

  // Omitting tests for the rest of the JAVA_* constants as these are defined
  // as extremely straightforward pass-throughs to the JDK methods.

  // We're testing the is(), isNot(), anyOf(), noneOf() and inRange() methods
  // below by testing their text-processing methods.

  // The organization of this test class is unusual, as it's not done by

	RET
TEXT ·a4(SB), 0, $0-0
	CMPL runtime·writeBarrier(SB), $0
	XORQ R15, R15
	RET
TEXT ·a5(SB), 0, $0-0
	CMPL runtime·writeBarrier(SB), $0
	XORL R15, R15
	RET
TEXT ·a6(SB), 0, $0-0
	CMPL runtime·writeBarrier(SB), $0
	POPQ R15
	PUSHQ R15
	RET
TEXT ·a7(SB), 0, $0-0
	CMPL runtime·writeBarrier(SB), $0
	MOVQ R15, AX // ERROR "when dynamic linking, R15 is clobbered by a global variable access and is used here"
	RET

interfaces into a single place. The interfaces themselves are located in
sub-modules, as described below.

Note that the file `__init__.py` in the TensorFlow source code tree is actually
only a placeholder to enable test cases to run. The TensorFlow build replaces
this file with a file generated from [`api_template.__init__.py`](https://www.github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/tensorflow/api_template.__init__.py)
"""