// Run shape inference function for newly added node.
      status->status = desc->graph->refiner.AddNode(ret);
    }
    if (status->status.ok()) {
      // Add the node to the name-to-node mapping.
      desc->graph->name_map[ret->name()] = ret;
    } else if (ret != nullptr) {
      desc->graph->graph.RemoveNode(ret);
      ret = nullptr;
    }
  }

  delete desc;

- Port mapping now allows the same `containerPort` of different containers to different `hostPort` without naming the mapping explicitly. ([#94494](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/94494), [@SergeyKanzhelev](https://github.com/SergeyKanzhelev))

The Kubernetes in-tree storage plugin to Container Storage Interface (CSI) migration infrastructure is now beta in Kubernetes v1.17. CSI migration was introduced as alpha in Kubernetes v1.14.

## Known Issues
- volumeDevices mapping ignored when container is privileged

    assertThat(replacementArray).hasLength(65536);
    // The final element should always be non-null.
    assertThat(replacementArray[replacementArray.length - 1]).isNotNull();
    // Exhaustively check all mappings (an int index avoids wrapping).
    for (int n = 0; n < replacementArray.length; n++) {
      char c = (char) n;
      String expected = map.get(c);
      if (expected == null) {
        assertThat(replacementArray[n]).isNull();

* `nodeSelector.matchFields` (node's `metadata.node`) is now supported in scheduler. ([#62453](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/62453), [@k82cn](https://github.com/k82cn))
* Added a parametrizable priority function mapping requested/capacity ratio to priority. This function is disabled by default and can be enabled via the scheduler policy config file.
([#63929](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63929), [@losipiuk](https://github.com/losipiuk))

  + Make sure you fill in the earliest version that you know has the issue.
+ Fork the repository on GitHub.

Making and Submitting Changes
--------------

We accept Pull Requests via GitHub. The [developer mailing list][dev-ml-list] is the
main channel of communication for contributors.  
There are some guidelines which will make applying PRs easier for us:

        // ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        // Value taken from p2
        // ----------------------------------------------------------------------

        assertEquals("mailing-list", p4.getMailingLists().get(0).getName());

        // ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        // Value taken from p1

Initially, the bound type parameters are known but the map is empty.
During type unification, if a new type argument <code>A</code> is inferred,
the respective mapping <code>P ➞ A</code> from type parameter to argument
is added to the map.
Conversely, when comparing types, a known type argument
(a type argument for which a map entry already exists)

            "stacking": {
              "group": "A",
              "mode": "none"
            },
            "thresholdsStyle": {
              "mode": "off"
            }
          },
          "mappings": [],
          "thresholds": {
            "mode": "absolute",
            "steps": [
              {
                "color": "green",
                "value": null
              },
              {

            "stacking": {
              "group": "A",
              "mode": "none"
            },
            "thresholdsStyle": {
              "mode": "off"
            }
          },
          "mappings": [],
          "thresholds": {
            "mode": "absolute",
            "steps": [
              {
                "color": "green",
                "value": null
              },
              {