assertNotNull("Validation should return a boolean result for: " + cron, Boolean.valueOf(result));
        }
    }

    // Test edge cases to understand the validation behavior
    public void test_edgeCaseBehavior() {
        String[] edgeCases = { "0 0 25 * * ?", // Invalid day of month
                "0 60 * * * ?", // Invalid minute
                "0 0 0 32 1 ?", // Invalid day

     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make
     * entrySet().add() tests tolerant of either behavior, introduce a map
     * feature for entrySet() that supports add(), or something else
     */
    return asList(
        getAddUnsupportedNotPresentMethod(),
        getAddAllUnsupportedNonePresentMethod(),

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Because of this situation, any public method accepting an iterable should invoke the {@code

			if testCase.expectedLocation != gotLocation {
				t.Errorf("expected %s, got %s", testCase.expectedLocation, gotLocation)
			}
		})
	}
}

// Tests getURLScheme function behavior.
func TestGetURLScheme(t *testing.T) {
	tls := false
	gotScheme := getURLScheme(tls)
	if gotScheme != httpScheme {
		t.Errorf("Expected %s, got %s", httpScheme, gotScheme)
	}
	tls = true

	KNAME=$(uname -s)
	ARCH=$(uname -m)
	case "${KNAME}" in
	SunOS)
		ARCH=$(isainfo -k)
		;;
	esac
}

## FIXME:
## In OSX, 'readlink -f' option does not exist, hence
## we have our own readlink -f behavior here.
## Once OSX has the option, below function is good enough.
##
## readlink() {
##     return /bin/readlink -f "$1"
## }
##
readlink() {
	TARGET_FILE=$1

	cd $(dirname $TARGET_FILE)

        } catch (SmbException e) {
            // This is the expected behavior per SMB specification
            deletionFailed = true;
            log.info("Non-empty directory deletion properly failed as expected: {}", e.getMessage());
        }

        // Directory behavior depends on whether deletion failed or succeeded