/** The key of the message: Username */
    public static final String LABELS_USERNAME = "{labels.username}";

    /** The key of the message: Value */
    public static final String LABELS_VALUE = "{labels.value}";

    /** The key of the message: Version No. */
    public static final String LABELS_VERSION_NO = "{labels.versionNo}";

    /** The key of the message: Schedule */

   * opening the data stream.
   *
   * <p>The default implementation returns {@link Optional#absent}. Some sources, such as a {@code
   * CharSequence}, may return a non-absent value. Note that in such cases, it is <i>possible</i>
   * that this method will return a different number of chars than would be returned by reading all
   * of the chars.
   *

  }

  abstract void doSetRate(double permitsPerSecond, long nowMicros);

  /**
   * Returns the stable rate (as {@code permits per seconds}) with which this {@code RateLimiter} is
   * configured with. The initial value of this is the same as the {@code permitsPerSecond} argument
   * passed in the factory method that produced this {@code RateLimiter}, and it is only updated
   * after invocations to {@linkplain #setRate}.
   */

	// workerStartMu sync.Mutex
	lastStarted time.Time

	wg sync.WaitGroup

	// Channel of log entries.
	// Reading logCh must hold read lock on logChMu (to avoid read race)
	// Sending a value on logCh must hold read lock on logChMu (to avoid closing)
	logCh   chan interface{}
	logChMu sync.RWMutex

	// If this webhook is being re-configured we will
	// assign the new webhook target to this field.

  }

  public <T> void testWhere_mapFromBoundedWildcard() {
    Type subtype = new TypeCapture<TypedKeyMap<T>>() {}.capture();
    // TODO(benyu): This should check equality to an expected value, see discussion in cl/98674873
    Type unused =
        new TypeResolver()
            .where(
                new TypeCapture<Map<Integer, T>>() {}.capture(),

    //    second thread can then dispatch to the subscriber it took before the first thread does.
    //
    // All this makes me really wonder if there's any value in queueing here at all. A dispatcher
    // that simply loops through the subscribers and dispatches the event to each would actually
    // probably provide a stronger order guarantee, though that order would obviously be different

	if eDate.Time.IsZero() {
		return nil
	}
	return e.EncodeElement(eDate.Format(time.RFC3339), startElement)
}

// ExpireDeleteMarker represents value of ExpiredObjectDeleteMarker field in Expiration XML element.
type ExpireDeleteMarker struct {
	Boolean
}

// Boolean signifies a boolean XML struct with custom marshaling
type Boolean struct {
	val    bool

  // address into 24 bits for the network portion and 8 bits for the host portion.
  // To allocate 256 IPs, set this field to 8 (a /24 mask for IPv4 or a /120 for IPv6).
  // Minimum value is 4 (16 IPs).
  // This field is immutable.
  // +required
  optional int32 perNodeHostBits = 2;

  // ipv4 defines an IPv4 IP block in CIDR notation(e.g. "10.0.0.0/8").

     * Completes the hash computation by performing final operations such
     * as padding. At the return of this engineDigest, the MD engine is
     * reset.
     *
     * @return the array of bytes for the resulting hash value.
     */
    public byte[] engineDigest () {
        // pad output to 56 mod 64; as RFC1320 puts it: congruent to 448 mod 512
        int bufferNdx = (int)(count % BLOCK_LENGTH);

          @Override
          public Adder apply(Adder adder) {
            return new FailsToForwardReturnValue(adder);
          }
        },
        "add(",
        "Return value");
  }

  public void testFailsToPropagateException() {
    assertFailure(
        Adder.class,
        new Function<Adder, Adder>() {
          @Override
          public Adder apply(Adder adder) {