* Therefore, we can always create our own TypeVariable.
         *
         * 2. Under the JDK, the built-in TypeVariable implementation does not interoperate with
         * ours. Therefore, we have to be careful about whether we create our own TypeVariable:
         *
         * 2a. If the resolved types are identical to the original types, then we can return the

//   "format": "XXXXX",
//   "XXXXX": {
//
//   }
// }
// Here "XXXXX" depends on the backend, currently we have "fs" and "xl" implementations.
// formatMetaV1 should be inherited by backend format structs. Please look at format-fs.go
// and format-xl.go for details.

// Ideally we will never have a situation where we will have to change the
// fields of this struct and deal with related migration.
type formatMetaV1 struct {

However, for the vast majority of issues, we aim to empower individuals to first resolve conflicts themselves, asking for help when needed, and only after that fails to escalate further. This approach gives people more control over the outcome of their dispute. 

If you are experiencing or witnessing conflict, we ask you to use the following escalation strategy to address the conflict:

    //     in all.
    // (3) "Successive". We can consider that we are exchanging a block of size d (a[0..d-1]) with a
    //     block of size n-d (a[d..n-1]), where in general these blocks have different sizes. If we
    //     imagine a line separating the first block from the second, we can proceed by exchanging

Free Software Foundation and other authors who decide to use it.  You
can use it too, but we suggest you first think carefully about whether
this license or the ordinary General Public License is the better
strategy to use in any particular case, based on the explanations below.

  When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom of use,
not price.  Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that

        // The root artifact may, or may not be resolved so we need to check before we attempt to resolve.
        // This is often an artifact like a POM that is taken from disk and we already have hold of the
        // file reference. But this may be a Maven Plugin that we need to resolve from a remote repository
        // as well as its dependencies.

	// Check if specified pools need to be removed from decommissioned pool.
	for k := range specifiedPools {
		pi, ok := rememberedPools[k]
		if !ok {
			// we do not have the pool anymore that we previously remembered, since all
			// the CLI checks out we can allow updates since we are mostly adding a pool here.
			update = true
		}
		if ok && pi.completed {

    users outside your own control), you should not use beta APIs unless you
    [repackage] them. **If your code is a library, we strongly recommend using
    the [Guava Beta Checker] to ensure that you do not use any `@Beta` APIs!**

2.  APIs without `@Beta` will remain binary-compatible for the indefinite
    future. (Previously, we sometimes removed such APIs after a deprecation
    period. The last release to remove non-`@Beta` APIs was Guava 21.0.) Even

   * FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()}.
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): or we could make HOLES_FORBIDDEN a feature. Or we could declare that
   * implementations are permitted to throw IAE if a hole is requested, and we could update
   * test*Hole to permit IAE. (But might this ignore genuine bugs?) But see the TODO above
   * testLower, which could make this all unnecessary

      }
      updateLastKnownIndex();
      /*
       * If the entry has been removed from the map, we return null, even though that might not be a
       * valid value. That's the best we can do, short of holding a reference to the most recently
       * seen value. And while we *could* do that, we aren't required to: Map.Entry explicitly says