}
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): surely we can find a less ugly solution than a class that accepts 3 parameters,
   * exposes as many getters, does work in the constructor, and has both a superclass and a subclass
   */
  public static class SortedMapSubmapTestMapGenerator<
          K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      extends ForwardingTestMapGenerator<K, V> implements TestSortedMapGenerator<K, V> {

     * to be passed to the readXxxWireFormat methods. This is
     * actually purer. However, in the case of smb we know the
     * wordCount and byteCount. And since every subclass of
     * ServerMessageBlock would have to perform the same read
     * operation on the input stream, we might as will pull that
     * common functionality into the superclass and read wordCount

    /*
     * requireNonNull is not safe: Joiner.on(...).join(somethingThatContainsNull) will indeed throw.
     * However, Joiner.on(...).useForNull(...).join(somethingThatContainsNull) *is* safe -- because
     * it returns a subclass of Joiner that overrides this method to tolerate null inputs.
     *
     * Unfortunately, we don't distinguish between these two cases in our public API: Joiner.on(...)

     * to be passed to the readXxxWireFormat methods. This is
     * actually purer. However, in the case of smb we know the
     * wordCount and byteCount. And since every subclass of
     * ServerMessageBlock would have to perform the same read
     * operation on the input stream, we might as will pull that
     * common functionality into the superclass and read wordCount

      Iterator<? extends T> iterator) {
    if (iterator instanceof PeekingImpl) {
      // Safe to cast <? extends T> to <T> because PeekingImpl only uses T
      // covariantly (and cannot be subclassed to add non-covariant uses).
      @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
      PeekingImpl<T> peeking = (PeekingImpl<T>) iterator;
      return peeking;
    }
    return new PeekingImpl<>(iterator);
  }

    }

    @Override
    public void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action) {
      iterable.forEach(action);
    }

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // safe upcast, assuming no one has a crazy Spliterator subclass
    @Override
    public Spliterator<T> spliterator() {
      return (Spliterator<T>) iterable.spliterator();
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return iterable.toString();

    return (Segment<K, V, E, S>[]) new Segment<?, ?, ?, ?>[ssize];
  }

  // Inner Classes

  /**
   * Segments are specialized versions of hash tables. This subclass inherits from ReentrantLock
   * opportunistically, just to simplify some locking and avoid separate construction.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("serial") // This class is never serialized.
  abstract static class Segment<

     */
    public String getUncPath() {
        return this.fileLocator.getUNCPath();
    }

    /**
     * Customizes the NT create request and response for subclass-specific behavior
     *
     * @param request the create request to customize
     * @param response the create response to customize
     */

avoids/fixes a potential security issue: as the returned object is passed directly to Pydantic, if the returned object was a subclass of the `response_model` (e.g. you return a `UserInDB` that inherits from `User` but contains extra fields, like `hashed_password`, and `User` is used in the `response_model`), it would still pass the validation (because `UserInDB` is a subclass of `User`) and the object would be returned as-is, including the `hashed_password`. To fix this, the declared `response_model`...

Works shall not include works that contain only declarations,
interfaces, types, classes, structures, or files of the Program solely
in each case in order to link to, bind by name, or subclass the Program
or Modified Works thereof.

"Distribute" means the acts of a) distributing or b) making available
in any manner that enables the transfer of a copy.