* serialize collections that are defined elsewhere.
 *
 * @author Jared Levy
 */
@GwtIncompatible
@J2ktIncompatible
final class Serialization {
  private Serialization() {}

  /**
   * Reads a count corresponding to a serialized map, multiset, or multimap. It returns the size of
   * a map serialized by {@link #writeMap(Map, ObjectOutputStream)}, the number of distinct elements

 *       MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator}.
 *   <li>If you manually call {@link java.util.concurrent.FutureTask#set} or a similar method,
 *       create a {@link SettableFuture} instead. (If your needs are more complex, you may prefer
 *       {@link AbstractFuture}.)
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p><b>Test doubles</b>: If you need a {@code ListenableFuture} for your test, try a {@link

 *       MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator}.
 *   <li>If you manually call {@link java.util.concurrent.FutureTask#set} or a similar method,
 *       create a {@link SettableFuture} instead. (If your needs are more complex, you may prefer
 *       {@link AbstractFuture}.)
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p><b>Test doubles</b>: If you need a {@code ListenableFuture} for your test, try a {@link

# Extra Models { #extra-models }

Continuing with the previous example, it will be common to have more than one related model.

This is especially the case for user models, because:

* The **input model** needs to be able to have a password.
* The **output model** should not have a password.
* The **database model** would probably need to have a hashed password.

/// danger

     * just to be safe.
     *
     * The real purpose of this test is to produce a TSAN failure if MapIteratorCache is unsafe for
     * reads from multiple threads -- unsafe, in fact, even in the absence of a concurrent write.
     * The specific problem we had was unsafe reads of lastEntryReturnedBySomeIterator. (To fix the
     * problem, we've since marked that field as volatile.)
     *

   * validate the well-formedness of their input.
   */
  public static Builder builder() {
    return new Builder();
  }

  /**
   * A builder for simple, fast escapers.
   *
   * <p>Typically an escaper needs to deal with the escaping of high valued characters or code
   * points. In these cases it is necessary to extend either {@link ArrayBasedCharEscaper} or {@link

    // ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    public boolean hasVersionRangeViolations() {
        return versionRangeViolations != null;
    }

    /**
     * TODO this needs to accept a {@link OverConstrainedVersionException} as returned by
     *       {@link #getVersionRangeViolation(int)} but it's not used like that in
     *       DefaultLegacyArtifactCollector
     *

For this, use the Python standard module <a href="https://docs.python.org/3/library/secrets.html" class="external-link" target="_blank">`secrets`</a> to check the username and password.

`secrets.compare_digest()` needs to take `bytes` or a `str` that only contains ASCII characters (the ones in English), this means it wouldn't work with characters like `á`, as in `Sebastián`.

            return buffer;
        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Integration Tests")
    class IntegrationTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should maintain state after multiple reads")
        void testMultipleReads() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
            // First read
            byte[] buffer1 = createValidWriteResponse(1024, 512);
            response.readBytesWireFormat(buffer1, 0);

      <name>ActivationFile</name>
      <version>1.0.0</version>
      <description><![CDATA[
        This is the file specification used to activate a profile. The missing value will be a the location
        of a file that needs to exist, and if it doesn't the profile must run.  On the other hand exists will test
        for the existence of the file and if it is there will run the profile.
      ]]></description>
      <fields>
        <field>