wantErr: `Each form field that you specify in a form must appear in the list of policy conditions. "Content-Encoding" not specified in the policy.`,
		},
		{
			name:    "many bucket values",
			fv:      defaultFormVals.Clone().Add("Bucket", "anotherbucket"),

### Resource allocation

A denial of service caused by one model could bring down the entire server, but
we don't consider this as a vulnerability, given that models can exhaust
resources in many different ways and solutions exist to prevent this from
happening (e.g., rate limits, ACLs, monitors to restart broken servers).

### Model sharing

                Arguments.of((IntGetter) FileEntry::getAttributes, 0, "no attributes"),
                Arguments.of((IntGetter) FileEntry::getAttributes, 0xFFFF, "many attributes"),

                Arguments.of((IntGetter) FileEntry::getFileIndex, -5, "negative index"),
                Arguments.of((IntGetter) FileEntry::getFileIndex, 0, "zero index"));
    }

```java
/** This interceptor compresses the HTTP request body. Many webservers can't handle this! */
final class GzipRequestInterceptor implements Interceptor {
  @Override public Response intercept(Interceptor.Chain chain) throws IOException {
    Request originalRequest = chain.request();

    expected.addAll(index, elements);
    expectContents(expected);
  }

  /*
   * TODO: if we're testing a list, we could check indexOf(). (Doing it in
   * AbstractListTester isn't enough because many tests that run on lists don't
   * extends AbstractListTester.) We could also iterate over all elements to
   * verify absence
   */
  protected void expectMissing(E... elements) {
    for (E element : elements) {

        /*
         * It's very unlikely that any loaded Futures class will see getChecked called with more
         * than a handful of exceptions. But it seems prudent to set a cap on how many we'll cache.
         * This avoids out-of-control memory consumption, and it keeps the cache from growing so
         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *

        Set<ConstraintViolation<TestBean>> violations = validator.validate(bean);
        assertFalse(violations.isEmpty());
        assertEquals(1, violations.size());

        // Test too many fields
        bean.setCronExpression("* * * * * * * *");
        violations = validator.validate(bean);
        assertFalse(violations.isEmpty());

        // Test too few fields

        /*
         * It's very unlikely that any loaded Futures class will see getChecked called with more
         * than a handful of exceptions. But it seems prudent to set a cap on how many we'll cache.
         * This avoids out-of-control memory consumption, and it keeps the cache from growing so
         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *

	disks, _ := set.getOnlineDisksWithHealing(false)
	if len(disks) == 0 {
		return fmt.Errorf("no online drives found for set with endpoints %s", set.getEndpoints())
	}

	// However many we ask, versions must exist on ~50%
	listingQuorum := (set.setDriveCount + 1) / 2

	// How to resolve partial results.
	resolver := metadataResolutionParams{

            "The network name cannot be found.",
            "No more connections can be made to this remote computer at this time because there are already as many connections as the computer can accept.",
            "Indicates a Windows NT Server could not be contacted or that objects within the domain are protected such that necessary information could not be retrieved.",