Let's look at how we can make that work.

## pytest.mark.anyio { #pytest-mark-anyio }

If we want to call asynchronous functions in our tests, our test functions have to be asynchronous. AnyIO provides a neat plugin for this, that allows us to specify that some test functions are to be called asynchronously.

    if (obj instanceof Subscriber) {
      Subscriber that = (Subscriber) obj;
      // Use == so that different equal instances will still receive events.
      // We only guard against the case that the same object is registered
      // multiple times
      return target == that.target && method.equals(that.method);
    }
    return false;
  }

  /**

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

    }

    /**
     * Returns a filter for directories that may contain paths accepted by the given matcher.
     * The given path matcher should be an instance created by this service.
     * The path matcher returned by this method expects directory paths.
     * If that matcher returns {@code false}, then the directory will definitively not contain

   *
   * <p>The returned iterable's iterator supports {@code remove()} if the iterator of the underlying
   * iterable supports it. Note that it is <i>not</i> possible to delete the last skipped element by
   * immediately calling {@code remove()} on that iterator, as the {@code Iterator} contract states

	notificationEventsErrorsTotalMD     = NewCounterMD(notificationEventsErrorsTotal, "Events that were failed to be sent to the targets")
	notificationEventsSentTotalMD       = NewCounterMD(notificationEventsSentTotal, "Total number of events sent to the targets")
	notificationEventsSkippedTotalMD    = NewCounterMD(notificationEventsSkippedTotal, "Events that were skipped to be sent to the targets due to the in-memory queue being full")
)

/**
 * Context object that holds query-related information and state during search processing.
 * Contains the query string, query builder, sort criteria, and various metadata.
 */
public class QueryContext {

    /** Prefix for queries that search only in URL fields. */
    protected static final String ALLINURL_FIELD_PREFIX = "allinurl:";

    /** Prefix for queries that search only in title fields. */

which are unordered by happens before.
</p>

<p>
Note that if there are no read-write or write-write data races on memory location <i>x</i>,
then any read <i>r</i> on <i>x</i> has only one possible <i>W</i>(<i>r</i>):
the single <i>w</i> that immediately precedes it in the happens before order.
</p>

<p>
More generally, it can be shown that any Go program that is data-race-free,

    }
}
```

/// note

Notice that even though the `item` was declared the same way as before, it is now expected to be inside of the body with a key `item`.

///

**FastAPI** will do the automatic conversion from the request, so that the parameter `item` receives its specific content and the same for `user`.

It will perform the validation of the compound data, and will document it like that for the OpenAPI schema and automatic docs.

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see