* GWT has a bug: It refuses to copy from an E[] to an Object[] when E is an
   * interface type.
   */
  // TODO: test other collections for this problem
  public void testOf_gwtArraycopyBug() {
    /*
     * The test requires:
     *
     * 1) An interface I extending Comparable<I> so that the created array is of

Özellikle, (diğer birçok araç arasında) Uvicorn, Starlette ve FastAPI'ın birlikte karşılaştırıldığını görebilirsiniz.

Aracın çözdüğü problem ne kadar basitse, elde edeceği performans o kadar iyi olur. Ayrıca kıyaslamaların çoğu, aracın sağladığı ek özellikleri test etmez.

Hiyerarşi şöyledir:

* **Uvicorn**: bir ASGI sunucusu

Insbesondere dass Uvicorn, Starlette und FastAPI zusammen verglichen werden (neben vielen anderen Tools).

Je einfacher das Problem, das durch das Tool gelöst wird, desto besser wird die Performanz sein. Und die meisten Benchmarks testen nicht die zusätzlichen Funktionen, die das Tool bietet.

Die Hierarchie ist wie folgt:

* **Uvicorn**: ein ASGI-Server

      if (uid == null) {
        // One or more integer values could be skipped in the event of a race
        // to generate a UID for the same object from multiple threads, but
        // that shouldn't be a problem.
        uid = counter.getAndIncrement();
        Integer alreadySet = uids.putIfAbsent(obj, uid);
        if (alreadySet != null) {
          uid = alreadySet;
        }
      }
      return uid;
    }

           *
           * (Users who try to operate directly on the `ScheduledFuture` may have additional
           * problems. For example, if they cancel that `Future`, it won't cancel the user-visible
           * `ListenableScheduledTask`. This is essentially the same problem as the
           * `ListenableScheduledTask` has with executor shutdown:
           * https://github.com/google/guava/issues/3553)
           */

* Якщо ви не розумієте питання, попросіть більше **подробиць**.

### Відтворіть проблему { #reproduce-the-problem }

У більшості випадків і запитань мова йде про **оригінальний код** людини.

Часто вони наводять лише фрагмент коду, але цього недостатньо, щоб **відтворити проблему**.

### Entiende el problema { #understand-the-problem }

* Primero, asegúrate de **entender el problema** que el pull request está intentando resolver. Podría tener una discusión más larga en una GitHub Discussion o issue.

   * iterators that don't support remove, passing one to the FilteredEntryMultimap constructor would
   * lead to a multimap whose removal operations would fail. This method combines the predicates to
   * avoid that problem.
   */
  private static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      Multimap<K, V> filterFiltered(
          FilteredMultimap<K, V> multimap, Predicate<? super Entry<K, V>> entryPredicate) {

   * iterators that don't support remove, passing one to the FilteredEntryMultimap constructor would
   * lead to a multimap whose removal operations would fail. This method combines the predicates to
   * avoid that problem.
   */
  private static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      Multimap<K, V> filterFiltered(
          FilteredMultimap<K, V> multimap, Predicate<? super Entry<K, V>> entryPredicate) {

* Если вопрос непонятен, запросите больше **деталей**.

### Воспроизвести проблему { #reproduce-the-problem }

В большинстве случаев и вопросов есть что-то связанное с **исходным кодом** автора.

Во многих случаях предоставляют только фрагмент кода, но этого недостаточно, чтобы **воспроизвести проблему**.