// This file is part of MinIO Object Storage stack
//
// This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
// it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as published by
// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
// (at your option) any later version.
//
// This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of

+ If you're planning to implement a new feature, it makes sense to discuss your changes
  on the [dev list](https://maven.apache.org/mailing-lists.html) first.
  This way you can make sure you're not wasting your time on something that isn't
  considered to be in Apache Maven's scope.
+ Submit a ticket for your issue, assuming one does not already exist.
  + Clearly describe the issue, including steps to reproduce when it is a bug.

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>The main purpose of {@link #addListener addListener} is to support this chaining. You will
 * rarely use it directly, in part because it does not provide direct access to the {@code Future}
 * result. (If you want such access, you may prefer {@link Futures#addCallback
 * Futures.addCallback}.) Still, direct {@code addListener} calls are occasionally useful:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * final String name = ...;

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>The main purpose of {@link #addListener addListener} is to support this chaining. You will
 * rarely use it directly, in part because it does not provide direct access to the {@code Future}
 * result. (If you want such access, you may prefer {@link Futures#addCallback
 * Futures.addCallback}.) Still, direct {@code addListener} calls are occasionally useful:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * final String name = ...;

            "-PtestJavaVersion=$testJvmVersion",
            "-PtestJavaVendor=$testJvmVendor",
        ) +
            buildScanTags.map { buildScanTagParam(it) } +
            buildScanValues.map { buildScanCustomValueParam(it.key, it.value) }
    ).filter { it.isNotBlank() }.joinToString(separator = " ")
}

fun functionalTestParameters(
    os: Os,
    arch: Arch = Arch.AMD64,
): List<String> =
    listOf(

    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

   * on the deserialized instance.
   *
   * <p>When the underlying delegate throws an exception then this memoizing supplier will keep
   * delegating calls until it returns valid data.
   *
   * <p>If {@code delegate} is an instance created by an earlier call to {@code memoize}, it is
   * returned directly.
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> Supplier<T> memoize(Supplier<T> delegate) {

If you open a GitHub Issue, here is our policy:

1.  It must be a bug/performance issue or a feature request or a build issue or
    a documentation issue (for small doc fixes please send a PR instead).
1.  Make sure the Issue Template is filled out.
1.  The issue should be related to the repo it is created in.

**Here's why we have this policy:** We want to focus on the work that benefits
the whole community, e.g., fixing bugs and adding features. Individual support

 *
 * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
 * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
 * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
 * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 *
 * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of

      render: java
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: How do you want it to be improved?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: Why do we need it to be improved?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: Example
      description: >