/**
     * The target class.
     */
    private final Class<?> targetClass;

    /**
     * The name of the method.
     */
    private final String methodName;

    /**
     * The classes of the method arguments.
     */
    private final Class<?>[] methodArgClasses;

    /**
     * Creates a {@link MethodNotFoundRuntimeException}.
     *
     * @param targetClass
     *            Target class

import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.List;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Base class for testers of classes (including {@link Collection} and {@link java.util.Map Map})
 * that contain elements.
 *
 * @param <C> the type of the container
 * @param <E> the type of the container's contents
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */

                                && (attributes.get("Fess-WebAppJar") != null || attributes.getValue("Fess-WebAppJar") != null)) {
                            createWebResourceSet(ResourceSetType.CLASSES_JAR, "/WEB-INF/classes", possibleJar.getURL(), "/");
                        }
                    }
                } catch (final Exception e) {
                    logger.log(Level.WARNING, e, () -> {

Remember that when you import `Query`, `Path`, and others from `fastapi`, those are actually functions that return special classes.

///

/// tip

Notice how each model's attribute with a type, default value and `Field` has the same structure as a *path operation function's* parameter, with `Field` instead of `Path`, `Query` and `Body`.

///

   * someone still manages to pass null, let's continue to have the method work.
   *
   * (PatternFilenameFilter is of course one of those classes that shouldn't be a publicly visible
   * class to begin with but rather something returned from a static factory method whose declared
   * return type is plain FilenameFilter. If we made such a change, then the annotation we choose

    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us

`checkstyle-result.xml` file.

Some general advice

- Don’t change public API lightly, avoid if possible, and include your reasoning in the PR if essential.  It causes pain for developers who use OkHttp and sometimes runtime errors.
- Favour a working external library if appropriate.  There are many examples of OkHttp libraries that can sit on top or hook in via existing APIs.

     *       then the test dependency will be placed on the Java {@code --patch-module} option instead of the
     *       class path.</li>
     * </ul>
     */
    CLASSES(StandardLocation.CLASS_PATH, "--class-path"),

    /**
     * The path identified by the Java {@code --module-path} option.
     * Used for compilation, execution and Javadoc among others.

      }
    }

    return Iterators.concat(subscriberIterators.iterator());
  }

  /**
   * A thread-safe cache that contains the mapping from each class to all methods in that class and
   * all super-classes, that are annotated with {@code @Subscribe}. The cache is shared across all
   * instances of this class; this greatly improves performance if multiple EventBus instances are

            return testContext != null ? testContext : super.createSearchLogContext(params, fessConfig);
        }
    }

    // Mock classes for addSearchLog tests

    private static class MockSearchRequestParams extends SearchRequestParams {
        @Override
        public String getQuery() {
            return "test query";
        }