String leading = ",a,b,c";
    Iterable<String> letters = Splitter.onPattern(",").split(leading);
    assertThat(letters).containsExactly("", "a", "b", "c").inOrder();
  }

  // TODO(kevinb): the name of this method suggests it might not actually be testing what it
  // intends to be testing?
  @GwtIncompatible // Splitter.onPattern
  public void testPatternSplitWithMultipleLetters() {
    Iterable<String> testPatterningMotto =

                    ((SmbComTransactionResponse) resp).nextElement();
                }
            }

            /* Verification fails (w/ W2K3 server at least) if status is not 0. This
             * suggests MS doesn't compute the signature (correctly) for error responses
             * (perhaps for DOS reasons).
             */
            if (digest != null && resp.errorCode == 0) {
                digest.verify(BUF, 4, resp);

}

// biggestZipBytes returns the bytes of a zip file biggest.zip
// that contains a zip file bigger.zip that contains a zip file
// big.zip that contains big.file, which contains 2³²-1 zeros.
// The big.zip file is interesting because it has no zip64 header,
// much like the innermost zip files in the well-known 42.zip.
//
// biggest.zip was generated by changing isZip64 to use > uint32max

        training loop.
    *   **Performance regression on `ParameterServerStrategy`.** This could be
        significant if you have many PS servers. We are aware of this issue and
        working on fixes, for now we suggest using the legacy optimizers when
        using `ParameterServerStrategy`.
    *   **Timeout or performance loss.** We don't anticipate this to happen, but
        if you see such issues, please use the legacy optimizer, and file

     */
    @Override
    public boolean verifySignature(final byte[] buffer, final int i, final int size) {
        /*
         * Verification fails (w/ W2K3 server at least) if status is not 0. This
         * suggests MS doesn't compute the signature (correctly) for error responses
         * (perhaps for DOS reasons).
         */
        /*
         * Looks like the failure case also is just reflecting back the signature we sent

    this.state.markReady();
  }

  /**
   * Registers a {@link Listener} to be {@linkplain Executor#execute executed} on the given
   * executor. The listener will not have previous state changes replayed, so it is suggested that
   * listeners are added before any of the managed services are {@linkplain Service#startAsync
   * started}.
   *
   * <p>{@code addListener} guarantees execution ordering across calls to a given listener but not

    checks if the PR looks good or needs additional changes.
-   If all looks good, the reviewer will approve the PR.
-   If a change is needed, the contributor is requested to make the suggested
    change.
-   You make the change and submit it for the review again.
-   This cycle repeats itself until the PR gets approved.
-   Note: As a friendly reminder, we may reach out to you if the PR is awaiting

   * while {@code ImmutableSortedSet.of(s)} returns an {@code ImmutableSortedSet<Set<String>>}
   * containing one element (the given set itself).
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> Despite what the method name suggests, if {@code elements} is an {@code
   * ImmutableSortedSet}, it may be returned instead of a copy.
   *
   * <p>This method is not type-safe, as it may be called on elements that are not mutually
   * comparable.
   *

	})
	for remove > 0 && len(leaves) > 0 {
		// Remove top entry.
		e := leaves[0]
		candidate := e.path
		if candidate == path && !compactSelf {
			// We should be the biggest,
			// if we cannot compact ourself, we are done.
			break
		}
		removing := d.totalChildrenRec(candidate.Key())
		flat := d.sizeRecursive(candidate.Key())
		if flat == nil {
			leaves = leaves[1:]

      return Arrays.copyOfRange(array, start, end);
    }

    @GwtIncompatible @J2ktIncompatible private static final long serialVersionUID = 0;
  }

  /**
   * This is adapted from the regex suggested by {@link Double#valueOf(String)} for prevalidating
   * inputs. All valid inputs must pass this regex, but it's semantically fine if not all inputs