// Strictly, this doesn't necessarily indicate a hidden 'this' in the case of
        // static initializer. But there seems no way to tell in that case. :(
        // This may cause issues when an anonymous class is created inside a static initializer,
        // and the class's constructor's first parameter happens to be the enclosing class.
        // In such case, we may mistakenly think that the class is within a non-static context

			if oi.DeleteMarker != object.addDeleteMarker {
				t.Fatalf("Expected, marker %t : got %t", object.addDeleteMarker, oi.DeleteMarker)
			}
		}
	}

	// Formulating the result data set to be expected from ListObjects call inside the tests,
	// This will be used in testCases and used for asserting the correctness of ListObjects output in the tests.

	resultCases := []ListObjectsInfo{
		{
			IsTruncated: false,

   * @throws ParameterNotInstantiableException if the static methods cannot be invoked because the
   *     default value of a parameter cannot be determined.
   * @throws IllegalAccessException if the class isn't public or is nested inside a non-public
   *     class, preventing its methods from being accessible.
   * @throws InvocationTargetException if a static method threw exception.
   */

   *   <li>A and B have equal {@link #edges() edge sets}.
   *   <li>Every edge in A and B connects the same nodes in the same direction (if any).
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Network properties besides {@link #isDirected() directedness} do <b>not</b> affect equality.
   * For example, two networks may be considered equal even if one allows parallel edges and the

        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
        E targetReturnValueFromNext = (E) targetReturnValue;
        /*
         * We have an Iterator<E> and want to cast it to MultiExceptionListIterator. Because we're
         * inside an AbstractIteratorTester<E>, that's implicitly a cast to
         * AbstractIteratorTester<E>.MultiExceptionListIterator. The runtime won't be able to verify

        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
        E targetReturnValueFromNext = (E) targetReturnValue;
        /*
         * We have an Iterator<E> and want to cast it to MultiExceptionListIterator. Because we're
         * inside an AbstractIteratorTester<E>, that's implicitly a cast to
         * AbstractIteratorTester<E>.MultiExceptionListIterator. The runtime won't be able to verify

SELECTOR_INDICATORS = '.carousel-indicators'\nconst SELECTOR_DATA_SLIDE = '[data-bs-slide], [data-bs-slide-to]'\nconst SELECTOR_DATA_RIDE = '[data-bs-ride=\"carousel\"]'\n\nconst KEY_TO_DIRECTION = {\n  [ARROW_LEFT_KEY]: DIRECTION_RIGHT,\n  [ARROW_RIGHT_KEY]: DIRECTION_LEFT\n}\n\nconst Default = {\n  interval: 5000,\n  keyboard: true,\n  pause: 'hover',\n  ride: false,\n  touch: true,\n  wrap: true\n}\n\nconst DefaultType = {\n  interval: '(number|boolean)', // TODO:v6 remove boolean support\n  keyboard:...

   *
   * Package-private "shouldn't" be necessary: The *AtomicHelper classes and AbstractFutureState
   * "should" be nestmates, so a call to MethodHandles.lookup or
   * AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater.newUpdater inside *AtomicHelper "should" have access to
   * AbstractFutureState's private fields. However, our open-source build uses `-source 8 -target
   * 8`, so the class files from that build can't express nestmates. Thus, when those class files

    failLeave.countDown(); // release the background thread
  }

  /**
   * Catches a bug where when constructing a service manager failed, later interactions with the
   * service could cause IllegalStateExceptions inside the partially constructed ServiceManager.
   * This ISE wouldn't actually bubble up but would get logged by ExecutionQueue. This obfuscated
   * the original error (which was not constructing ServiceManager correctly).
   */

These are issues that we believe are particularly well suited for outside
contributions, often because we probably won't get to them right now. If you
decide to start on an issue, leave a comment so that other people know that
you're working on it. If you want to help out, but not alone, use the issue
comment thread to coordinate.

### Contribution guidelines and standards