When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server

   * response code like 404 or 500.
   *
   * @throws IOException if the request could not be executed due to cancellation, a connectivity
   *     problem or timeout. Because networks can fail during an exchange, it is possible that the
   *     remote server accepted the request before the failure.
   * @throws IllegalStateException when the call has already been executed.
   */

        }
    }

    /**
     * Initializes the necessary probes for monitoring system resources.
     */
    static void initializeProbes() {
        // Force probes to be loaded
        ProcessProbe.getInstance();
        OsProbe.getInstance();
        JvmInfo.jvmInfo();
    }

    /**

   * problematic AtomicReferenceFieldUpdaterAtomicHelper code path. However, the same problem *does*
   * matter with AggregateFutureState, which does not have an Unsafe-based helper.
   *
   * This same problem is one of the reasons for us to likewise use package-private for the fields
   * in Waiter.
   */

  /**

   * call cancel() and be unable to cancel the delegate.
   * There are a number of ways to solve this, none of which are very pretty, and it is currently
   * believed to be a purely theoretical problem (since the other actions should supply sufficient
   * write-barriers).
   */

  @LazyInit private @Nullable ListenableFuture<V> delegateRef;
  @LazyInit private @Nullable ScheduledFuture<?> timer;

## Acessando o corpo da requisição em um manipulador de exceção

/// tip | Dica

Para resolver esse mesmo problema, é provavelmente muito mais fácil usar o `body` em um manipulador personalizado para `RequestValidationError` ([Tratando Erros](../tutorial/handling-errors.md#use-the-requestvalidationerror-body){.internal-link target=_blank}).

## Website

[fess.codelibs.org](https://fess.codelibs.org/)

## Probleme/Fragen

[discuss.codelibs.org](https://discuss.codelibs.org/c/FessEN/)

## Erste Schritte

## Accediendo al request body en un manejador de excepciones

/// tip | Consejo

Para resolver este mismo problema, probablemente sea mucho más fácil usar el `body` en un manejador personalizado para `RequestValidationError` ([Manejo de Errores](../tutorial/handling-errors.md#use-the-requestvalidationerror-body){.internal-link target=_blank}).

    * Quelle que soit la taille de votre serveur ou la taille de chacune des applications qu'il contient.
    * Il existe cependant une solution à ce problème.
* Il existe une extension du protocole TLS (celui qui gère le cryptage au niveau TCP, avant HTTP) appelée <a
  href="https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication" class="external-link" target="_blank"><abbr

E se o seu servidor remoto ou máquina virtual tiver apenas 3 GB de RAM, tentar carregar mais de 4 GB de RAM causará problemas. 🚨

### Processos Múltiplos - Um Exemplo

Neste exemplo, há um **Processo Gerenciador** que inicia e controla dois **Processos de Trabalhadores**.