return delegate.createArray(length);
              }

              @Override
              public Iterable<E> order(List<E> insertionOrder) {
                List<E> list = new ArrayList<>();
                for (E e : delegate.order(insertionOrder)) {
                  list.add(e);
                }
                Collections.reverse(list);
                return list;
              }

		builder.WriteString(" OF ")
		builder.WriteQuoted(locking.Table)
	}

	if locking.Options != "" {
		builder.WriteByte(' ')
		builder.WriteString(locking.Options)
	}
}

// MergeClause merge order by clauses
func (locking Locking) MergeClause(clause *Clause) {
	clause.Expression = locking

   * TestContainerGenerator#order(List)}. Tests should use this method only if they declare
   * requirement {@link com.google.common.collect.testing.features.CollectionFeature#KNOWN_ORDER}.
   */
  protected List<E> getOrderedElements() {
    List<E> list = new ArrayList<>();
    for (E e : getSubjectGenerator().order(new ArrayList<E>(getSampleElements()))) {
      list.add(e);
    }

            assertEquals(manyDialects[i], SMBUtil.readInt2(buffer, 24 + i * 2));
        }
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test encode preserves dialect order")
    void testEncodePreservesDialectOrder() {
        // Use dialects in specific order
        int[] orderedDialects = new int[] { 0x0311, 0x0302, 0x0300, 0x0210, 0x0202 };

        ValidateNegotiateInfoRequest request =

        // file. Ideally, we'd do full pattern-evaluation against the sysprops, but this
        // is a first step. There are several replacements below, in order to normalize
        // the path character before we operate on the string as a regex input, and
        // in order to avoid surprises with the File construction...
        // -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  2005-04-29

Abstract

  We're moving toward integrating mojos as first-class plexus components, while
  at the same time avoiding introducing required plexus dependencies into the
  mojo development model.

  In order to really achieve this, we need mojo configurations (which are
  provided both in terms of static expressions that are just looked up, and
  in terms of user-provided configuration from properties or the POM).

  }

  /**
   * Constructs a {@code HashCode} from the {@code Hasher} objects of the functions. Each of them
   * has consumed the entire input and they are ready to output a {@code HashCode}. The order of the
   * hashers are the same order as the functions given to the constructor.
   */
  // this could be cleaner if it passed HashCode[], but that would create yet another array...
  /* protected */ abstract HashCode makeHash(Hasher[] hashers);

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Executor ensuring that all Runnables submitted are executed in order, using the provided
 * Executor, and sequentially such that no two will ever be running at the same time.
 *
 * <p>Tasks submitted to {@link #execute(Runnable)} are executed in FIFO order.
 *
 * <p>The execution of tasks is done by one thread as long as there are tasks left in the queue.

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Executor ensuring that all Runnables submitted are executed in order, using the provided
 * Executor, and sequentially such that no two will ever be running at the same time.
 *
 * <p>Tasks submitted to {@link #execute(Runnable)} are executed in FIFO order.
 *
 * <p>The execution of tasks is done by one thread as long as there are tasks left in the queue.

    @DisplayName("Strategy Ordering")
    class StrategyOrderingTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("should execute strategies in priority order")
        void shouldExecuteStrategiesInPriorityOrder() throws Exception {
            // This test verifies that strategies are executed in the order they are provided
            // The actual priority ordering is handled by dependency injection
            UpgradeContext context = createMockContext();