*       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

    /**
     * Retrieves every toolchains of given type available in user settings.
     *
     * @param type the type, must not be {@code null}
     * @param context the Maven session, must not be {@code null}
     * @since 3.0 (addition of the <code>MavenSession</code> parameter)
     */
    ToolchainPrivate[] getToolchainsForType(String type, MavenSession context) throws MisconfiguredToolchainException;

    /**

    //                                                                  ==================
    /**
     * The supplier of user type.
     */
    @FunctionalInterface
    public interface UserTypeSupplier {
        /**
         * Supply the user type.
         * @return The user type.
         */
        OptionalThing<String> supply();
    }

    /**
     * The supplier of user bean.
     */

 */
public abstract class TypeParameter<T> extends TypeCapture<T> {

  final TypeVariable<?> typeVariable;

  protected TypeParameter() {
    Type type = capture();
    checkArgument(type instanceof TypeVariable, "%s should be a type variable.", type);
    this.typeVariable = (TypeVariable<?>) type;
  }

  @Override
  public final int hashCode() {
    return typeVariable.hashCode();
  }

  @Override

	relations := []Relation{
		{
			Name: "Account", Type: schema.HasOne, Schema: "User", FieldSchema: "Account",
			References: []Reference{{"ID", "User", "UserID", "Account", "", true}},
		},
		{
			Name: "Pets", Type: schema.HasMany, Schema: "User", FieldSchema: "Pet",
			References: []Reference{{"ID", "User", "UserID", "Pet", "", true}},
		},
		{
			Name: "Toys", Type: schema.HasMany, Schema: "User", FieldSchema: "Toy",