*       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

        verify(mockNetbiosName).getName();
        verify(mockNetbiosName).getScope();
        verify(mockNetbiosName).getNameType();
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should handle interface method contracts")
    void testMethodContracts() {
        // The interface should allow for various implementations
        // Test that methods can return any valid values

        // Names can be any string

	for i, testCase := range testCases {
		// obtain the put bucket policy request body.
		// initialize HTTP NewRecorder, this records any mutations to response writer inside the handler.
		recV4 := httptest.NewRecorder()
		// construct HTTP request for PUT bucket policy endpoint.
		reqV4, err := newTestSignedRequestV4(http.MethodPut, getPutPolicyURL("", testCase.bucketName),

        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("SamrCloseHandle Tests")
    class SamrCloseHandleTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should construct with correct opnum")
        void testConstructorAndOpnum() {
            // When: Creating close handle message
            samr.SamrCloseHandle message = new samr.SamrCloseHandle(mockPolicyHandle);

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

        defaultSettings.put("onelogin.saml2.contacts.technical.given_name", "Technical Guy");
        defaultSettings.put("onelogin.saml2.contacts.technical.email_address", "******@****.***");
        defaultSettings.put("onelogin.saml2.contacts.support.given_name", "Support Guy");
        defaultSettings.put("onelogin.saml2.contacts.support.email_address", "support@@example.com");
    }

    /**

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code