{\n  display: block;\n}\n\n.was-validated .custom-control-input:valid ~ .custom-control-label, .custom-control-input.is-valid ~ .custom-control-label {\n  color: #28a745;\n}\n\n.was-validated .custom-control-input:valid ~ .custom-control-label::before, .custom-control-input.is-valid ~ .custom-control-label::before {\n  border-color: #28a745;\n}\n\n.was-validated .custom-control-input:valid:checked ~ .custom-control-label::before, .custom-control-input.is-valid:checked ~ .custom-control-label::before...

*   Add toggles `tf.enable_control_flow_v2()` and `tf.disable_control_flow_v2()`
    for enabling/disabling v2 control flow.
*   Enable v2 control flow as part of `tf.enable_v2_behavior()` and
    `TF2_BEHAVIOR=1`.
*   AutoGraph translates Python control flow into TensorFlow expressions,
    allowing users to write regular Python inside `tf.function`-decorated

 * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
 * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
 * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 *
 * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
 * Lesser General Public License for more details.
 *

/**
 * Defines the options specific to Maven operations.
 * This interface extends the general {@link Options} interface, adding Maven-specific configuration options.
 *
 * <p>These options represent the various flags and settings available through the Maven CLI,
 * as well as those that can be specified in the {@code maven.config} file. They provide fine-grained
 * control over Maven's behavior during the build process.</p>
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */

    assertEquals(control(NE, 1), entry(NE, 1));
    assertFalse(control(NE, 1).equals(entry(NE, 2)));
    assertFalse(entry(NE, 1).equals(control("bar", 1)));
    assertFalse(entry(NE, 1).equals(new Object()));
    assertFalse(entry(NE, 1).equals(null));
  }

  public void testHashCode() {
    assertEquals(control("foo", 1).hashCode(), entry("foo", 1).hashCode());

 * validate batching, chaining, signing, and NT_CREATE_ANDX extended handling.
 */
class AndXServerMessageBlockTest {

    /**
     * Test stub for AndXServerMessageBlock to control read/write logic.
     */
    static class DummyAndXBlock extends AndXServerMessageBlock {
        int paramWordsWritten = 0;
        int bytesWritten = 0;
        int paramWordsRead = 0;
        int bytesRead = 0;

.form-check-input:valid~.valid-tooltip{display:block}.custom-control-input.is-valid~.custom-control-label,.was-validated .custom-control-input:valid~.custom-control-label{color:#28a745}.custom-control-input.is-valid~.custom-control-label::before,.was-validated .custom-control-input:valid~.custom-control-label::before{border-color:#28a745}.custom-control-input.is-valid:checked~.custom-control-label::before,.was-validated .custom-control-input:valid:checked~.custom-control-label::before{border-col...

// it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as published by
// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
// (at your option) any later version.
//
// This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
// GNU Affero General Public License for more details.
//

                                            <la:text styleId="name" property="name" styleClass="form-control"/>
                                        </c:if>
                                        <c:if test="${crudMode==2}">
                                            ${f:h(name)}
                                            <la:hidden property="name" styleClass="form-control"/>
                                        </c:if>

are skipped, and any checks implemented inside the shape inference code are not
executed.

The security impact of skipping those checks should be low, since the attack
scenario would require a malicious user to be able to control the model which as
stated above is already equivalent to code execution. In any case, the
recommendation is not to serve models using Eager mode since it also has
performance limitations.

## Multi-Tenant environments