on his policy is granted more privileges than restricted
    by the users IAM policy.

    This is due to an issue of prefix based Matcher() function
    which was incorrectly matching prefix based on resource
    prefixes instead of exact match.
```

        return dataStoreMap.get(name.toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT));
    }

    /**
     * Returns an array of available data store names discovered from plugin JAR files.
     * This method implements a time-based caching mechanism that refreshes the list
     * every 60 seconds to balance performance with up-to-date plugin discovery.
     *
     * @return array of data store names sorted alphabetically, never null
     */

     * crawlers to retrieve only a subset of the Sitemaps in the index i.e. a
     * crawler may only retrieve Sitemaps that were modified since a certain
     * date. This incremental Sitemap fetching mechanism allows for the rapid
     * discovery of new URLs on very large sites.
     */
    private String lastmod;

    /**
     * Creates a new SitemapFile instance.
     */
    public SitemapFile() {

import jcifs.CIFSContext;
import jcifs.DfsReferralData;
import jcifs.DfsResolver;
import jcifs.SmbTransport;
import jcifs.internal.dfs.DfsReferralDataImpl;
import jcifs.internal.dfs.DfsReferralDataInternal;

/**
 * Caching DFS resolver implementation
 *
 *
 * <p>This class is intended for internal use.</p>
 */
public class DfsImpl implements DfsResolver {

   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@linkplain LoadingCache#get(Object) awaiting the result of a pending load} rather than
   *       starting a redundant one
   *   <li>eliminating the error-prone caching boilerplate
   *   <li>tracking load {@linkplain #stats statistics}
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Among the further improvements that {@code LoadingCache} can provide but this method cannot:
   *
   * <ul>

        // Second call should return cached value (same as first)
        Subject second = auth.getSubject();
        if (first == null && second == null) {
            // Both null - caching is working
            assertNull(second, "Second getSubject should return same result as first (both null)");
        } else if (first != null && second != null) {
            // Both non-null - should be same instance

    // Start by looking for exact matches. We start at the leftmost label. For example, foo.bar.com
    // will look like: [foo, bar, com], [bar, com], [com]. The longest matching rule wins.
    var exactMatch: String? = null
    for (i in domainLabelsUtf8Bytes.indices) {
      val rule = publicSuffixList.bytes.binarySearch(domainLabelsUtf8Bytes, i)
      if (rule != null) {
        exactMatch = rule

        }
        return asJson(new ApiResponse().status(Status.OK).result());
    }

    /**
     * Deletes documents matching the given query from the search index.
     *
     * @param body the search parameters defining which documents to delete
     * @return JSON response containing the count of deleted documents
     */

import junit.framework.TestSuite;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Creates, based on your criteria, a JUnit test suite that exhaustively tests the object generated
 * by a G, selecting appropriate tests by matching them against specified features.
 *
 * @param <B> The concrete type of this builder (the 'self-type'). All the Builder methods of this
 *     class (such as {@link #named}) return this type, so that Builder methods of more derived

import java.nio.file.Files;

import org.codelibs.curl.Curl;
import org.junit.After;
import org.junit.Test;

/**
 * Test class for ContentCache.
 * Tests memory-based and file-based content caching.
 */
public class ContentCacheTest {

    private File tempFile;

    @After
    public void tearDown() {
        if (tempFile != null && tempFile.exists()) {
            tempFile.delete();
        }