*
 * <h4>Guarantees</h4>
 *
 * <p>Each makes the following guarantees:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li><b>Shallow immutability.</b> Elements can never be added, removed or replaced in this
 *       collection. This is a stronger guarantee than that of {@link
 *       Collections#unmodifiableCollection}, whose contents change whenever the wrapped collection
 *       is modified.

    ImmutableList<E> buildSorted(Comparator<? super E> comparator) {
      // Currently only used by ImmutableListMultimap.Builder.orderValuesBy.
      // In particular, this implies that the comparator can never get "removed," so this can't
      // invalidate future builds.

      forceCopy = true;
      Arrays.sort((E[]) contents, 0, size, comparator);
      return asImmutableList(contents, size);
    }
  }

equality-based selector in 1.1).
        * .spec.uniqueLabelKey is removed -- users can’t customize unique label key --
and its default value is changed from
“deployment.kubernetes.io/podTemplateHash” to “pod-template-hash”.
        * .spec.strategy.rollingUpdate.minReadySeconds is moved to .spec.minReadySeconds
  * DaemonSet was Alpha in 1.1 (though it had apiVersion extensions/v1beta1) and

      putNext(this, next);
    }

    void unpark() {
      // This is racy with removeWaiter. The consequence of the race is that we may spuriously call
      // unpark even though the thread has already removed itself from the list. But even if we did
      // use a CAS, that race would still exist (it would just be ever so slightly smaller).
      Thread w = thread;
      if (w != null) {
        thread = null;

   * TypeVariableImpl} today. (We could probably then make {@code TypeVariableImpl} implement {@code
   * AnnotatedElement} so that we get partial compile-time checking.)
   *
   * <p>This workaround should be removed at a distant future time when <a
   * href="https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/115932459">Android supports {@code
   * AnnotatedType}</a>.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("removal") // b/318391980

    waiter2.start();
    waiter2.awaitWaiting();
    // The waiter queue should be waiter2->waiter1

    // This should wake up waiter1 and cause the waiter1 node to be removed.
    waiter1.interrupt();

    waiter1.join();
    waiter2.awaitWaiting(); // should still be blocked

    LockSupport.unpark(waiter2); // spurious wakeup

    public boolean containsKey(@Nullable Object key) {
      return StandardTable.this.contains(key, columnKey);
    }

    @Override
    public @Nullable V remove(@Nullable Object key) {
      return StandardTable.this.remove(key, columnKey);
    }

    /** Removes all {@code Column} mappings whose row key and value satisfy the given predicate. */
    @CanIgnoreReturnValue

		}
	}

	specifiedPools := make(map[string]int)
	for idx, pool := range pools {
		specifiedPools[pool.endpoints.CmdLine] = idx
	}

	var update bool
	// Check if specified pools need to be removed from decommissioned pool.
	for k := range specifiedPools {
		pi, ok := rememberedPools[k]
		if !ok {
			// we do not have the pool anymore that we previously remembered, since all

     * to ["a", "b", ""].
     */
    private fun pop() {
      val removed = encodedPathSegments.removeAt(encodedPathSegments.size - 1)

      // Make sure the path ends with a '/' by either adding an empty string or clearing a segment.
      if (removed.isEmpty() && encodedPathSegments.isNotEmpty()) {
        encodedPathSegments[encodedPathSegments.size - 1] = ""
      } else {

      putNext(this, next);
    }

    void unpark() {
      // This is racy with removeWaiter. The consequence of the race is that we may spuriously call
      // unpark even though the thread has already removed itself from the list. But even if we did
      // use a CAS, that race would still exist (it would just be ever so slightly smaller).
      Thread w = thread;
      if (w != null) {
        thread = null;