private static final byte[] ARRAY234 = {(byte) 2, (byte) 3, (byte) 4};

  private static final byte[] VALUES = {Byte.MIN_VALUE, -1, 0, 1, Byte.MAX_VALUE};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (byte value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Bytes.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Byte.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

 * finalization to happen. However, a call to {@code System.gc()} is specified to be no more than a
 * hint, so this technique may fail at the whim of the JDK implementation, for example if a user
 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *

cpovirk <******@****.***> 1773406752 -0700

cpovirk <******@****.***> 1773406752 -0700

        Long.MIN_VALUE,
        Long.MAX_VALUE
      };

  private static final double[] VALUES = Doubles.concat(NUMBERS, new double[] {NaN});

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (double value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Doubles.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Double.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

   * elements will appear in the returned list in the same order they appeared in {@code elements}.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> According to our
   * benchmarking
   * on Open JDK 7, {@link #immutableSortedCopy} generally performs better (in both time and space)
   * than this method, and this method in turn generally performs better than copying the list and
   * calling {@link Collections#sort(List)}.
   */

 * substituted. Also, implementations of {@code hashCode} tend to be poor-quality, in part because
 * they end up depending on <i>other</i> existing poor-quality {@code hashCode} implementations,
 * including those in many JDK classes.
 *
 * <p>{@code Object.hashCode} implementations tend to be very fast, but have weak collision
 * prevention and <i>no</i> expectation of bit dispersion. This leaves them perfectly suitable for

        Long.MIN_VALUE,
        Long.MAX_VALUE
      };

  private static final float[] VALUES = Floats.concat(NUMBERS, new float[] {NaN});

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (float value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Floats.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Float.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

  private static final int GREATEST = Integer.MAX_VALUE;

  private static final int[] VALUES = {LEAST, (int) -1, (int) 0, (int) 1, GREATEST};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (int value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Ints.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Integer.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

        Long.MIN_VALUE,
        Long.MAX_VALUE
      };

  private static final float[] VALUES = Floats.concat(NUMBERS, new float[] {NaN});

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (float value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Floats.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Float.hashCode(value));
    }
  }