ImmutableRangeSet.<Integer>builder()
            .add(Range.closed(5, 8))
            .add(Range.closedOpen(1, 3))
            .build();

    assertThat(rangeSet.asRanges())
        .containsExactly(Range.closedOpen(1, 3), Range.closed(5, 8))
        .inOrder();

    assertTrue(rangeSet.intersects(Range.closed(1, 2)));
    assertTrue(rangeSet.intersects(Range.open(5, 8)));

	conn := client.gridConn()
	if conn == nil {
		return false
	}
	return client.restClient.IsOnline() || conn.State() == grid.StateConnected
}

// Close - marks the client as closed.
func (client *peerRESTClient) Close() error {
	client.restClient.Close()
	return nil
}

// GetLocks - fetch older locks for a remote node.

			xioutil.SafeClose(c.done)
			c.done = nil
		}
	}
	return n, err
}

func (c *closeNotifier) Close() error {
	if c.done != nil {
		xioutil.SafeClose(c.done)
		c.done = nil
	}
	return c.rc.Close()
}

// keepHTTPReqResponseAlive can be used to avoid timeouts with long storage
// operations, such as bitrot verification or data usage scanning.
// Every 10 seconds a space character is sent.

 * ("open"). If a range is unbounded on a side, it is neither open nor closed on that side; the
 * bound simply does not exist.
 *
 * @since 10.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
public enum BoundType {
  /** The endpoint value <i>is not</i> considered part of the set ("exclusive"). */
  OPEN(false),
  CLOSED(true);

  final boolean inclusive;

    of unacknowledged data per stream and no per-connection limit.

 *  Fix: Don't close a `Deflater` while we're still using it to compress a web socket message. We
    had a severe bug where web sockets were closed on the wrong thread, which caused
    `NullPointerException` crashes in `Deflater`.

Es ist mehrmals passiert, dass es PRs mit drei, fünf oder mehr Zustimmungen gibt, wahrscheinlich weil die Beschreibung ansprechend ist, aber wenn ich die PRs überprüfe, sind sie tatsächlich fehlerhaft, haben einen Bug, oder lösen das Problem nicht, welches sie behaupten, zu lösen. 😅

Daher ist es wirklich wichtig, dass Sie den Code wirklich lesen und ausführen und mir in den Kommentaren mitteilen, dass Sie dies getan haben. 🤓

///

          range.lowerBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED,
          range.upperEndpoint(),
          range.upperBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED);
    } else if (range.hasLowerBound()) {
      return set.tailSet(range.lowerEndpoint(), range.lowerBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED);
    } else if (range.hasUpperBound()) {
      return set.headSet(range.upperEndpoint(), range.upperBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED);
    }
    return checkNotNull(set);

    Stopwatch stopwatch = Stopwatch.createStarted();

    String result = proxy.sleepThenReturnInput("x");

    assertThat(result).isEqualTo("x");
    assertThat(stopwatch.elapsed(MILLISECONDS)).isIn(Range.closed(DELAY_MS, ENOUGH_MS));
    assertThat(target.finished).isTrue();
  }

  public void testNewProxy_goodMethodWithNotEnoughTime() throws Exception {
    SampleImpl target = new SampleImpl(9999);

						return true, nil
					}
					return false, err
				}
				err = d.deserialize(r)
				r.Close()
				return err != nil, nil
			case InsufficientReadQuorum, StorageErr:
				return true, nil
			}
			return false, err
		}
		err = d.deserialize(r)
		r.Close()
		return err != nil, nil
	}

	// Caches are read+written without locks,
	retries := 0
	for retries < 5 {

In most setups this will keep the scanner slow enough to not impact overall system performance. Setting the `delay` key to a *lower* value will make the scanner faster and setting it to 0 will make the scanner run at full speed (not recommended in production). Setting it to a higher value will make the scanner slower, consuming less resources with the trade off of not collecting metrics for operations like healing and disk usage as fast.

```