int access = accessCaptor.getValue();
        boolean hasReadData = (access & SmbConstants.FILE_READ_DATA) != 0;
        assertEquals(alsoRead, hasReadData, "FILE_READ_DATA flag presence should match alsoRead");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("openCopyTargetFile retries after removing READONLY and succeeds")
    void openCopyTargetFile_retryOnReadonly_thenSuccess() throws Exception {
        // Arrange

    }

    /**
     * Calculates the relative path from the base directory of the parent to the parent directory of the base directory
     * of the child. The general idea is to adjust inherited URLs to match the project layout (in SCM).
     *
     * <p>This calculation is only a heuristic based on our conventions.
     * In detail, the algo relies on the following assumptions: <ul>

             <b>fastapi run</b>

             Logs:

     <span style="background-color:#007166"><font color="#D3D7CF"> INFO </font></span>  Will watch for changes in these directories:
             <b>[</b><font color="#4E9A06">&apos;/home/user/code/awesomeapp&apos;</font><b>]</b>

		return
	}

	// 3. Compare generated key with decrypted key
	if subtle.ConstantTimeCompare(key.Plaintext, decryptedKey) != 1 {
		response.DecryptionErr = "The generated and the decrypted data key do not match"
		resp, err := json.Marshal(response)
		if err != nil {
			writeCustomErrorResponseJSON(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErr(ErrInternalError), err.Error(), r.URL)
			return
		}
		writeSuccessResponseJSON(w, resp)

		},
	}

	for i, test := range testCases {
		keyvalues := restQueries(test.keys...)
		for j := range keyvalues {
			if keyvalues[j] != test.keyvalues[j] {
				t.Fatalf("test %d: keyvalues[%d] does not match", i+1, j)
			}
		}
	}
}

func TestLCP(t *testing.T) {
	testCases := []struct {
		prefixes     []string
		commonPrefix string
	}{
		{[]string{"", ""}, ""},
		{[]string{"a", "b"}, ""},

        "uid": "${DS_PROMETHEUS}"
      },
      "description": "",
      "fieldConfig": {
        "defaults": {
          "mappings": [
            {
              "options": {
                "match": "null",
                "result": {
                  "text": "N/A"
                }
              },
              "type": "special"
            }
          ],
          "thresholds": {

            result.setName(DfTypeUtil.toString(source.get("name")));
            result.setSessionId(DfTypeUtil.toString(source.get("sessionId")));
            return updateEntity(source, result);
        } catch (InstantiationException | IllegalAccessException e) {
            final String msg = "Cannot create a new instance: " + entityType.getName();
            throw new IllegalBehaviorStateException(msg, e);
        }
    }

            result.setUpdatedBy(DfTypeUtil.toString(source.get("updatedBy")));
            result.setUpdatedTime(DfTypeUtil.toLong(source.get("updatedTime")));
            return updateEntity(source, result);
        } catch (InstantiationException | IllegalAccessException e) {
            final String msg = "Cannot create a new instance: " + entityType.getName();
            throw new IllegalBehaviorStateException(msg, e);
        }
    }

            result.setUpdatedTime(DfTypeUtil.toLong(source.get("updatedTime")));
            result.setUserAgent(DfTypeUtil.toString(source.get("userAgent")));
            return updateEntity(source, result);
        } catch (InstantiationException | IllegalAccessException e) {
            final String msg = "Cannot create a new instance: " + entityType.getName();
            throw new IllegalBehaviorStateException(msg, e);
        }
    }

            // FIXME There should be no duplicates, yet there are some
            return upgradedProperties.stream()
                .distinct()
                .collect(ImmutableList.toImmutableList());
        } catch (IOException e) {
            throw UncheckedException.throwAsUncheckedException(e);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Automatically accept changes that are valid property upgrades of a getter or setter.
     *