Rene Groeschke <******@****.***> 1622539170 +0200

- Update kubedns and nodelocaldns to release version 1.22.28 ([#121908](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/121908), [@mzaian](https://github.com/mzaian)) [SIG Cloud Provider]
- Update some interfaces' signature in scheduler:
  
  1. PluginsRunner: use NodeInfo in `RunPreScorePlugins` and `RunScorePlugins`.
  2. PreScorePlugin: use NodeInfo in `PreScore`.

package com.google.common.graph;

import java.util.Set;

/**
 * Supertype for {@link Graphs}, containing the old signatures of methods whose signatures we've
 * changed. This provides binary compatibility for users who compiled against the old signatures.
 */
abstract class GraphsBridgeMethods {

  @SuppressWarnings("PreferredInterfaceType")
  public static <N> Graph<N> transitiveClosure(Graph<N> graph) {
    return Graphs.transitiveClosure(graph);

 */
@GwtCompatible
@J2ktIncompatible // Super-sourced
abstract class GwtFluentFutureCatchingSpecialization<V extends @Nullable Object>
    extends AbstractFuture<V> {
  /*
   * This server copy of the class is empty. The corresponding GWT copy contains alternative
   * versions of catching() and catchingAsync() with slightly different signatures from the ones
   * found in FluentFuture.java.

 * different signatures.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@J2ktIncompatible // Super-sourced
abstract class GwtFuturesCatchingSpecialization {
  /*
   * This server copy of the class is empty. The corresponding GWT copy contains alternative
   * versions of catching() and catchingAsync() with slightly different signatures from the ones
   * found in Futures.java.
   */

                } else {
                    classDoc.addClassMethod(methodDoc);
                    signatures.add(method.getOverrideSignature());
                }
            }
        }

        for (ClassDoc supertype : classDoc.getSuperTypes()) {
            for (MethodDoc method: supertype.getClassMethods()){
                if (signatures.add(method.getMetaData().getOverrideSignature())) {
                    classDoc.addClassMethod(method);

FB01          ; mapped                 ; 0066 0069     # 1.1  LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FI
FB02          ; mapped                 ; 0066 006C     # 1.1  LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FL
FB03          ; mapped                 ; 0066 0066 0069 #1.1  LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FFI
FB04          ; mapped                 ; 0066 0066 006C #1.1  LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FFL

        method signatures would look like, for example, even if the method and class names are still
        in flux. This can make the feature you're suggesting much clearer to us.

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: (Optional) What would the method signatures for your feature look like?
      placeholder: |
        e.g.,

     *
     * @return whether signatures are supported but not required
     * @throws SmbException if an error occurs checking signing status
     */
    boolean isSigningOptional() throws SmbException;

    /**
     * Checks if message signing is mandatory for this connection.
     *
     * @return whether signatures are enforced from either side

package org.codelibs.fess.suggest.index.operations;

/**
 * Encapsulates the context parameters commonly passed to content indexing operations.
 * Groups together index name, field configuration, and bad words to simplify method signatures.
 */
public class ContentIndexingContext {

    private final String index;
    private final String[] supportedFields;
    private final String[] tagFieldNames;
    private final String roleFieldName;