import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.Runnables.doNothing;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;

import com.google.common.base.Predicate;
import com.google.common.base.Predicates;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
import com.google.common.collect.Iterables;
import java.util.ArrayList;

    // causing the thread to be suspended for 3.5 seconds, and then park itself for 2 seconds after
    // being resumed. To avoid a flake in this scenario, calculate how long that thread actually
    // waited and assert based on that time. Empirically, the race where the thread ends up waiting
    // for 5.5 seconds happens about 2% of the time.

    entry = cacheEntry1;
    if (entry != null && entry.key == key) {
      return entry.value;
    }
    entry = cacheEntry2;
    if (entry != null && entry.key == key) {
      // Promote second cache entry to first so the access pattern
      // [K1, K2, K1, K3, K1, K4...] still hits the cache half the time.
      addToCache(entry);
      return entry.value;
    }
    return null;
  }

  @Override

En particulier, on voit Uvicorn, Starlette et FastAPI comparés (parmi de nombreux autres outils).

Plus le problème résolu par un outil est simple, mieux seront les performances obtenues. Et la plupart des tests de performance ne prennent pas en compte les fonctionnalités additionnelles fournies par les outils.

La hiérarchie est la suivante :

* **Uvicorn** : un serveur ASGI

     * </p>
     *
     * @param <T>
     *            the type of the array elements
     * @param a
     *            first array
     * @param b
     *            second array
     * @return the concatenated result array
     */
    public static <T> T[] addAll(final T[] a, final T[] b) {
        if (a == null) {
            return b;
        }
        if (b == null) {

import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.directExecutor;
import static java.util.concurrent.Executors.newScheduledThreadPool;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThrows;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;

        urlFilter.addInclude("https://first.com/.*");

        // Second initialization with same session ID
        urlFilter.init(sessionId);
        urlFilter.addInclude("https://second.com/.*");

        // Both patterns should work
        assertTrue(urlFilter.match("https://first.com/page"));
        assertTrue(urlFilter.match("https://second.com/page"));
    }

    /**

          serialNumber = it[1] as BigInteger,
          signature = it[2] as AlgorithmIdentifier,
          issuer = (it[3] as Pair<*, *>).second as List<List<AttributeTypeAndValue>>,
          validity = it[4] as Validity,
          subject = (it[5] as Pair<*, *>).second as List<List<AttributeTypeAndValue>>,
          subjectPublicKeyInfo = it[6] as SubjectPublicKeyInfo,
          issuerUniqueID = it[7] as BitString?,

	for {
		if err := sm.load(ctx, newObjectLayerFn()); err == nil {
			<-ctx.Done()
			return
		}
		duration := max(time.Duration(r.Float64()*float64(time.Second*10)),
			// Make sure to sleep at least a second to avoid high CPU ticks.
			time.Second)
		time.Sleep(duration)
	}
}

// load resync metrics saved on disk into memory
func (sm *siteResyncMetrics) load(ctx context.Context, objAPI ObjectLayer) error {

    builder.addEscape(' ', "-");
    builder.addEscape('!', "$");
    Escaper second = builder.build();
    // This should have no effect on existing escapers.
    builder.addEscape(' ', "*");

    // Test both escapers after modifying the builder.
    assertThat(first.escape("The Quick Brown Fox!")).isEqualTo("Xhe_Xuick_Xrown_XoxX");
    assertThat(second.escape("The Quick Brown Fox!")).isEqualTo("Xhe-Xuick-Xrown-Xox$");
  }