- Kubeadm: started using a named port 'probe-port' for all probes in the static pod manifests for kube-apiserver, kube-controller-manager, kube-scheduler and etc. If you have previously patched the port values in probes with kubeadm patches, you must now also patch the named port value in the pod container under 'ports'. ([#132776](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/132776),...

## Breaking Changes

*   `tf.keras`:
    *   In `tf.keras.applications` the name of the "top" layer has been
        standardized to "predictions". This is only a problem if your code
        relies on the exact name of the layer.
    *   Huber loss function has been updated to be consistent with other Keras
        losses. It now computes mean over the last axis of per-sample losses

### Sugerir soluciones

* Después de poder entender la pregunta, puedes darles un posible **respuesta**.

* En muchos casos, es mejor entender su **problema subyacente o caso de uso**, porque podría haber una mejor manera de resolverlo que lo que están intentando hacer.

### Pide cerrar

Sin embargo, si solo usas `pip` directamente, los paquetes se instalarían en tu **entorno global de Python** (la instalación global de Python).

### El Problema

Entonces, ¿cuál es el problema de instalar paquetes en el entorno global de Python?

No entanto, se você usar `pip` diretamente, os pacotes serão instalados no seu **ambiente Python global** (a instalação global do Python).

### O Problema

Então, qual é o problema em instalar pacotes no ambiente global do Python?

    Settings getEffectiveSettings();

    /**
     * Gets the problems that were encountered during the settings building. Note that only problems of severity
     * {@link BuilderProblem.Severity#WARNING} and below are reported here. Problems with a higher severity level cause
     * the settings builder to fail with a {@link SettingsBuilderException}.
     *

    /**
     * Gets the problems that were encountered during the settings building. Note that only problems of severity
     * {@link BuilderProblem.Severity#WARNING} and below are reported here. Problems with a higher severity level cause
     * the settings builder to fail with a {@link ToolchainsBuilderException}.
     *

            return result.getFileModel().getId();
        } else {
            return "";
        }
    }

    /**
     * Gets the problems that caused this exception.
     *
     * @return The problems that caused this exception, never {@code null}.
     */
    public ProblemCollector<ModelProblem> getProblemCollector() {
        if (result == null) {

     */
    public SettingsBuilderException(String message, Exception e) {
        super(message, e);
    }

    public SettingsBuilderException(String message, ProblemCollector<BuilderProblem> problems) {
        super(message, problems);
    }

     */
    public ToolchainsBuilderException(String message, Exception e) {
        super(message, e);
    }

    public ToolchainsBuilderException(String message, ProblemCollector<BuilderProblem> problems) {
        super(message, problems);
    }