@CollectionFeature.Require({SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE, KNOWN_ORDER})
  public void testRemovingIteratorKnownOrder() {
    new IteratorTester<E>(
        4,
        MODIFIABLE,
        getSubjectGenerator().order(asList(e0(), e1(), e1(), e2())),
        IteratorTester.KnownOrder.KNOWN_ORDER) {
      @Override
      protected Iterator<E> newTargetIterator() {
        return getSubjectGenerator().create(e0(), e1(), e1(), e2()).iterator();

 *
 * <h2>Repository Resolution Process</h2>
 *
 * <p>When resolving dependencies, Maven follows this order:</p><ol>
 * <li>Check Local Repository: Maven first checks if the artifact is available in the local repository.</li>
 * <li>Check Remote Repositories: If the artifact is not found locally, Maven queries the configured remote repositories in the order they are listed.</li>

      },
      "queryId": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "userSessionId": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "url": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "order": {
        "type": "integer"
      },
      "requestedAt": {
        "type": "date",
        "format": "date_optional_time"
      },
      "queryRequestedAt": {
        "type": "date",

    @Override
    public Entry<String, Integer>[] createArray(int length) {
      return (Entry<String, Integer>[]) new Entry<?, ?>[length];
    }

    @Override
    public Iterable<Entry<String, Integer>> order(List<Entry<String, Integer>> insertionOrder) {
      return new Ordering<Entry<String, Integer>>() {
        @Override
        public int compare(Entry<String, Integer> left, Entry<String, Integer> right) {

	sum64 := siphash.Hash(k0, k1, []byte(key))
	return int(sum64 % uint64(cardinality))
}

// hashOrder - hashes input key to return consistent
// hashed integer slice. Returned integer order is salted
// with an input key. This results in consistent order.
// NOTE: collisions are fine, we are not looking for uniqueness
// in the slices returned.
func hashOrder(key string, cardinality int) []int {
	if cardinality <= 0 {

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return "Doubles.lexicographicalComparator()";
    }
  }

  /**
   * Sorts the elements of {@code array} in descending order.
   *
   * <p>Note that this method uses the total order imposed by {@link Double#compare}, which treats
   * all NaN values as equal and 0.0 as greater than -0.0.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */

 *        h
 *      / | \
 *     /  e  \
 *    d       g
 *   /|\      |
 *  / | \     f
 * a  b  c
 * }
 *
 * <p>can be iterated over in preorder (hdabcegf), postorder (abcdefgh), or breadth-first order
 * (hdegabcf).
 *
 * <p>Null nodes are strictly forbidden.
 *
 * <p>Because this is an abstract class, not an interface, you can't use a lambda expression to
 * implement it:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * // won't work

            assertEquals(manyDialects[i], SMBUtil.readInt2(buffer, 24 + i * 2));
        }
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test encode preserves dialect order")
    void testEncodePreservesDialectOrder() {
        // Use dialects in specific order
        int[] orderedDialects = new int[] { 0x0311, 0x0302, 0x0300, 0x0210, 0x0202 };

        ValidateNegotiateInfoRequest request =

given the values read from and written to memory.
That execution must be consistent with the <i>sequenced before</i> relation,
defined as the partial order requirements set out by the <a href="/ref/spec">Go language specification</a>
for Go's control flow constructs as well as the <a href="/ref/spec#Order_of_evaluation">order of evaluation for expressions</a>.
</p>

<p>
A Go <i>program execution</i> is modeled as a set of goroutine executions,

		}
	}

	if DB.Dialector.Name() == "sqlserver" {
		// sqlserver doesn't support order by in subquery
		return
	}
	results, err = db.Preload("Pets", func(db gorm.PreloadBuilder) error {
		db.Order("name desc").LimitPerRecord(5)
		return nil
	}).Where("name in ?", names).Find(ctx)

	for _, result := range results {
		if result.Name == u.Name {