*/
  public static long min(long... array) {
    checkArgument(array.length > 0);
    long min = flip(array[0]);
    for (int i = 1; i < array.length; i++) {
      long next = flip(array[i]);
      if (next < min) {
        min = next;
      }
    }
    return flip(min);
  }

  /**
   * Returns the greatest value present in {@code array}, treating values as unsigned.
   *

estes
estiven
estou
eu
é
facer
foi
foron
fun
había
hai
iso
isto
la
las
lle
lles
lo
los
mais
me
meu
meus
min
miña
miñas
moi
na
nas
neste
nin
no
non
nos
nosa
nosas
noso
nosos
nós
nun
nunha
nuns
nunhas
o
os
ou
ó
ós
para
pero
pode
pois
pola
polas
polo
polos

    assertThrows(
        ConcurrentModificationException.class,
        () -> {
          Iterator<Entry<K, V>> iterator = getMap().entrySet().iterator();
          getMap().remove(k0());
          iterator.next();
        });
  }

  @MapFeature.Require({FAILS_FAST_ON_CONCURRENT_MODIFICATION, SUPPORTS_REMOVE})
  @CollectionSize.Require(SEVERAL)
  public void testRemovePresentConcurrentWithKeySetIteration() {
    assertThrows(

     */
    public static AvPair get ( List<AvPair> pairs, int type ) {
        Iterator<AvPair> it = pairs.iterator();
        while ( it.hasNext() ) {
            AvPair p = it.next();
            if ( p.getType() == type ) {
                return p;
            }
        }
        return null;
    }


    /**
     * Remove all occurances of the given type
     * 

///

/// info

In this example we use invented custom headers `X-Key` and `X-Token`.

But in real cases, when implementing security, you would get more benefits from using the integrated [Security utilities (the next chapter)](../security/index.md){.internal-link target=_blank}.

///

## Dependencies errors and return values

You can use the same dependency *functions* you use normally.

### Dependency requirements

    assertTrue(iterator.hasNext());
    assertEquals("1", iterator.next());
    assertTrue(iterator.hasNext());
    assertEquals("2", iterator.next());
    assertTrue(iterator.hasNext());
    assertEquals("3", iterator.next());
    assertTrue(iterator.hasNext());
    assertEquals("4", iterator.next());
    assertFalse(iterator.hasNext());
    try {
      iterator.next();
      fail("did not detect end of list");

    assertTrue(iterator.hasNext());
    assertEquals("1", iterator.next());
    assertTrue(iterator.hasNext());
    assertEquals("2", iterator.next());
    assertTrue(iterator.hasNext());
    assertEquals("3", iterator.next());
    assertTrue(iterator.hasNext());
    assertEquals("4", iterator.next());
    assertFalse(iterator.hasNext());
    try {
      iterator.next();
      fail("did not detect end of list");

        try {
          Event nextEvent;
          while ((nextEvent = queueForThread.poll()) != null) {
            while (nextEvent.subscribers.hasNext()) {
              nextEvent.subscribers.next().dispatchEvent(nextEvent.event);
            }
          }
        } finally {
          dispatching.remove();
          queue.remove();
        }
      }
    }

        printErrors(result);

        Iterator<Artifact> i = result.getArtifacts().iterator();
        assertEquals(n, i.next(), "n should be first");
        assertEquals(m, i.next(), "m should be second");

        // inverse order
        set = new LinkedHashSet<>();
        set.add(m);
        set.add(n);

 * acquire(1000)} will result in exactly the same throttling, if any), but it affects the throttling
 * of the <i>next</i> request. I.e., if an expensive task arrives at an idle RateLimiter, it will be
 * granted immediately, but it is the <i>next</i> request that will experience extra throttling,
 * thus paying for the cost of the expensive task.
 *
 * @author Dimitris Andreou
 * @since 13.0
 */