iamConfigPolicyDBServiceAccountsPrefix = iamConfigPolicyDBPrefix + "service-accounts/"
	iamConfigPolicyDBGroupsPrefix          = iamConfigPolicyDBPrefix + "groups/"

	// IAM identity file which captures identity credentials.
	iamIdentityFile = "identity.json"

	// IAM policy file which provides policies for each users.
	iamPolicyFile = "policy.json"

	// IAM group members file
	iamGroupMembersFile = "members.json"

	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/color"
	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/config"
	xldap "github.com/minio/minio/internal/config/identity/ldap"
	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/config/identity/openid"
	idplugin "github.com/minio/minio/internal/config/identity/plugin"
	xtls "github.com/minio/minio/internal/config/identity/tls"
	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/config/policy/opa"
	polplugin "github.com/minio/minio/internal/config/policy/plugin"

                  protected List<String> create(String[] elements) {
                    List<String> fromList = Lists.newArrayList(elements);
                    return transform(fromList, Functions.<String>identity());
                  }
                })
            .named("Lists.transform, random access, nulls")
            .withFeatures(
                CollectionSize.ANY,
                ListFeature.REMOVE_OPERATIONS,

Next, we create a `HeroPublic` model, this is the one that will be **returned** to the clients of the API.

It has the same fields as `HeroBase`, so it won't include `secret_name`.

Finally, the identity of our heroes is protected! 🥷

It also re-declares `id: int`. By doing this, we are making a **contract** with the API clients, so that they can always expect the `id` to be there and to be an `int` (it will never be `None`).

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [false] < [false, true] < [true]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(boolean[],
   * boolean[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<boolean[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [false] < [false, true] < [true]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(boolean[],
   * boolean[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<boolean[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

bing

// bingo : Binky Moon, LLC
// https://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/bingo.html
bingo

// bio : Identity Digital Limited
// https://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/bio.html
bio

// black : Identity Digital Limited
// https://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/black.html
black

// blackfriday : Registry Services, LLC

                      table.put(cell.getRowKey(), cell.getColumnKey(), cell.getValue());
                    }
                    return transformValues(table, Functions.<Character>identity()).cellSet();
                  }
                })
            .named("TransformValues.cellSet")
            .withFeatures(
                CollectionSize.ANY,

 *
 * <p>Advantages compared to {@code long[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>All the many well-known advantages of immutability (read <i>Effective Java</i>, third
 *       edition, Item 17).
 *   <li>Has the value-based (not identity-based) {@link #equals}, {@link #hashCode}, and {@link
 *       #toString} behavior you expect.
 *   <li>Offers useful operations beyond just {@code get} and {@code length}, so you don't have to

   * name, even if their bounds differ.
   *
   * <p>While resolving a type variable from a {@code var -> type} map, we don't care whether the
   * type variable's bound has been partially resolved. As long as the type variable "identity"
   * matches.
   *
   * <p>On the other hand, if for example we are resolving {@code List<A extends B>} to {@code
   * List<A extends String>}, we need to compare that {@code <A extends B>} is unequal to {@code <A