La façon dont vous l'utilisez est très simple. Par exemple, pour faire une requête `GET`, vous devez écrire :

```Python
response = requests.get("http://example.com/some/url")
```

En contrepartie l'API _des opérations de chemin_ de FastAPI pourrait ressembler à ceci :

```Python hl_lines="1"
@app.get("/some/url")
def read_url():
    return {"message": "Hello World"}
```

   *
   * <p>Invalid: - Collected: key/value was partially collected, but not yet cleaned up
   */
  interface InternalEntry<K, V, E extends InternalEntry<K, V, E>> {
    /** Gets the next entry in the chain. */
    E getNext();

    /** Gets the entry's hash. */
    int getHash();

    /** Gets the key for this entry. */
    K getKey();

    /** Gets the value for the entry. */
    V getValue();

	log.Info("configuring host-level iptables rules (healthchecks, etc)")

	iptablesBuilder := builder.NewIptablesRuleBuilder(ipbuildConfig(cfg.cfg))

	// For easier cleanup, insert a jump into an owned chain
	// -A POSTROUTING -p tcp -j ISTIO_POSTRT
	iptablesBuilder.AppendRule(
		iptableslog.UndefinedCommand, iptablesconstants.POSTROUTING, iptablesconstants.NAT,
		"-j", ChainHostPostrouting,
	)

 *   <li>Supports a copy-free {@link #subArray} view, so methods that accept this type don't need to
 *       add overloads that accept start and end indexes.
 *   <li>Can be streamed without "breaking the chain": {@code foo.getBarInts().stream()...}.
 *   <li>Access to all collection-based utilities via {@link #asList} (though at the cost of
 *       allocating garbage).
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code int[]}:

   *
   * <p>Invalid: - Collected: key/value was partially collected, but not yet cleaned up
   */
  interface InternalEntry<K, V, E extends InternalEntry<K, V, E>> {
    /** Gets the next entry in the chain. */
    E getNext();

    /** Gets the entry's hash. */
    int getHash();

    /** Gets the key for this entry. */
    K getKey();

    /** Gets the value for the entry. */
    V getValue();

 *   <li>Supports a copy-free {@link #subArray} view, so methods that accept this type don't need to
 *       add overloads that accept start and end indexes.
 *   <li>Can be streamed without "breaking the chain": {@code foo.getBarDoubles().stream()...}.
 *   <li>Access to all collection-based utilities via {@link #asList} (though at the cost of
 *       allocating garbage).
 * </ul>
 *

        context.projectSettingsPath = projectSettingsFile;
        context.userSettingsPath = userSettingsFile;

        Function<String, String> interpolationSource = Interpolator.chain(
                context.invokerRequest.userProperties()::get, context.invokerRequest.systemProperties()::get);
        SettingsBuilderRequest settingsRequest = SettingsBuilderRequest.builder()

little of the right-hand bit to try the effect:  the next moment
she felt a violent blow underneath her chin:  it had struck her
foot!

  She was a good deal frightened by this very sudden change, but
she felt that there was no time to be lost, as she was shrinking
rapidly; so she set to work at once to eat some of the other bit.
Her chin was pressed so closely against her foot, that there was

		// fmt.Printf("Upcoming: %s %s\n", req.Method, req.URL.String())
		// for i, c := range via {
		// 	fmt.Printf("Sofar %d: %s %s\n", i, c.Method, c.URL.String())
		// }
		// Save the last request in a redirect chain.
		lastReq = req
		// We do not follow redirect back to client application.
		if req.URL.Path == "/oauth_callback" {
			return http.ErrUseLastResponse
		}
		return nil
	}

	// the policy lookup would ambiguous.
	if r.TLS == nil {
		writeSTSErrorResponse(ctx, w, ErrSTSInsecureConnection, errors.New("No TLS connection attempt"))
		return
	}

	// A client may send a certificate chain such that we end up
	// with multiple peer certificates. However, we can only accept
	// a single client certificate. Otherwise, the certificate to
	// policy mapping would be ambiguous.