statusCode: 400,
		cause:      err,
	}
}

func errAmbiguousFieldName(err error) *s3Error {
	return &s3Error{
		code:       "AmbiguousFieldName",
		message:    "Field name matches to multiple fields in the file. Check the SQL expression and the file, and try again.",
		statusCode: 400,
		cause:      err,
	}
}

func errIntegerOverflow(err error) *s3Error {
	return &s3Error{

import java.util.List;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Tester to make sure the {@code iterator().remove()} implementation of {@code Multiset} works when
 * there are multiple occurrences of elements.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@Ignore // Affects only Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.

# Query Parameter Models

If you have a group of **query parameters** that are related, you can create a **Pydantic model** to declare them.

This would allow you to **re-use the model** in **multiple places** and also to declare validations and metadata for all the parameters at once. 😎

/// note

This is supported since FastAPI version `0.115.0`. 🤓

///

## Query Parameters with a Pydantic Model

/**
 * A {@code Multiset} implementation with predictable iteration order. Its iterator orders elements
 * according to when the first occurrence of the element was added. When the multiset contains
 * multiple instances of an element, those instances are consecutive in the iteration order. If all
 * occurrences of an element are removed, after which that element is added to the multiset, the
 * element will appear at the end of the iteration.

issue in TensorFlow Lite that is not about Converters, Play Services or Ops
body: - type: dropdown id: issue-type attributes: label: Issue Type description:
What type of issue would you like to report? multiple: false options: - Bug -
Build/Install - Performance - Support - Feature Request - Documentation Feature
Request - Documentation Bug - Others validations: required: true - type:

The main logic with ADRs is to describe (architectural) decisions made:

* To provide best practices and solutions we (as the *build tool* team) want to promote.
* To avoid asking the same thing multiple times during code review.
* To explain *rejected solutions*, for now, and future development, in case they are proposed again.

ADRs can be written by any team.
Like code, they should be reviewed by any other relevant teams.

PersistentVolumeClaim.
  * Run multiple schedulers in parallel, e.g. one or more custom schedulers
alongside the default Kubernetes scheduler, using pod annotations to select
among the schedulers for each pod. Documentation is [here](http://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/multiple-schedulers.md), design doc is [here](docs/proposals/multiple-schedulers.md).

    } catch (expected: IllegalArgumentException) {
      assertThat(expected.message).isEqualTo("string includes multiple certificates")
    }
    try {
      decode(pkcs8Pem + certificatePem + pkcs8Pem)
      fail<Any>()
    } catch (expected: IllegalArgumentException) {
      assertThat(expected.message).isEqualTo("string includes multiple private keys")
    }
  }

  @Test
  fun decodeWrongType() {
    try {
      decode(

                this.supportsEncryption = true;
            }
            else if ( ncr.getContextType() == EncryptionNegotiateContext.NEGO_CTX_ENC_TYPE ) {
                log.error("Multiple encryption negotiate contexts");
                return false;
            }
            else if ( !foundPreauth && ncr.getContextType() == PreauthIntegrityNegotiateContext.NEGO_CTX_PREAUTH_TYPE ) {

///

## Without Pydantic