HashCode hashCodeB = HashCode.fromBytes(bytesB);

    // They aren't equal...
    assertFalse(hashCodeA.equals(hashCodeB));

    // But they still have the same Object#hashCode() value.
    // Technically not a violation of the equals/hashCode contract, but...?
    assertEquals(hashCodeA.hashCode(), hashCodeB.hashCode());
  }

  public void testRoundTripHashCodeUsingFromString() {

   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> when this method is used, the resulting map will use identity ({@code ==})
   * comparison to determine equality of keys, which is a technical violation of the {@link Map}
   * specification, and may not be what you expect.
   *
   * @throws IllegalStateException if the key strength was already set
   * @see WeakReference
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue

    HashCode hashCodeB = HashCode.fromBytes(bytesB);

    // They aren't equal...
    assertFalse(hashCodeA.equals(hashCodeB));

    // But they still have the same Object#hashCode() value.
    // Technically not a violation of the equals/hashCode contract, but...?
    assertEquals(hashCodeA.hashCode(), hashCodeB.hashCode());
  }

  public void testRoundTripHashCodeUsingFromString() {

    assertEquals("", matcher.trimFrom(s));
    assertEquals(s.length(), matcher.countIn(s));
  }

  // Kotlin subSequence()/replace() always return new strings, violating expectations of this test
  @J2ktIncompatible
  public void testGeneral() {
    doTestGeneral(is('a'), 'a', 'b');
    doTestGeneral(isNot('a'), 'b', 'a');
    doTestGeneral(anyOf("x"), 'x', 'z');

    assertEquals("", matcher.trimFrom(s));
    assertEquals(s.length(), matcher.countIn(s));
  }

  // Kotlin subSequence()/replace() always return new strings, violating expectations of this test
  @J2ktIncompatible
  public void testGeneral() {
    doTestGeneral(is('a'), 'a', 'b');
    doTestGeneral(isNot('a'), 'b', 'a');
    doTestGeneral(anyOf("x"), 'x', 'z');

   * actually remain in the file, something that it {@linkplain java.io.FileInputStream#skip(long)
   * specifies} it can do in its Javadoc despite the fact that it is violating the contract of
   * {@code InputStream.skip()}.
   */
  private static long skipSafely(InputStream in, long n) throws IOException {
    int available = in.available();

- Fixed a suboptimal scheduler preemption behavior where potential preemption victims were violating Pod Disruption Budgets. ([#128307](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/128307), [@NoicFank](https://github.com/NoicFank)) [SIG Scheduling]

  affinities. This option can be used as an optimization for higher scheduling throughput
  (at the cost of an occasional pod being scheduled non-optimally/violating existing
  pods preferred inter-pod affinities). To enable this scheduler option, set the

- The status of v1beta1 CRDs without "preserveUnknownFields:false" now shows a violation, "spec.preserveUnknownFields: Invalid value: true: must be false". ([#93078](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/93078), [@vareti](https://github.com/vareti))

- Fixed a suboptimal scheduler preemption behavior where potential preemption victims were violating Pod Disruption Budgets. ([#128435](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/128435), [@NoicFank](https://github.com/NoicFank)) [SIG Scheduling]

## Dependencies

### Added
_Nothing has changed._