import org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger;
import org.codelibs.core.lang.ThreadUtil;
import org.codelibs.core.timer.TimeoutTarget;

/**
 * AccessTimeoutTarget is a class that implements the TimeoutTarget interface.
 * It is used to interrupt a running thread when a timeout occurs.
 * The class provides methods to interrupt the thread and stop the timeout target.
 *
 * <p>
 * The class uses a logger to log debug messages.

  })
  @ParametricNullness
  final V blockingGet(long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
      throws InterruptedException, TimeoutException, ExecutionException {
    // NOTE: if timeout < 0, remainingNanos will be < 0 and we will fall into the while(true) loop
    // at the bottom and throw a timeoutexception.
    long timeoutNanos = unit.toNanos(timeout); // we rely on the implicit null check on unit.

   *
   * @param service the {@code ExecutorService} to shut down
   * @param timeout the maximum time to wait for the {@code ExecutorService} to terminate
   * @param unit the time unit of the timeout argument
   * @return {@code true} if the {@code ExecutorService} was terminated successfully, {@code false}
   *     if the call timed out or was interrupted
   * @since 17.0
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue

  })
  @ParametricNullness
  final V blockingGet(long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
      throws InterruptedException, TimeoutException, ExecutionException {
    // NOTE: if timeout < 0, remainingNanos will be < 0 and we will fall into the while(true) loop
    // at the bottom and throw a timeoutexception.
    long timeoutNanos = unit.toNanos(timeout); // we rely on the implicit null check on unit.

    // we try hard to make them robust in practice.  We could additionally try to add in a system
    // load timeout multiplier.  Or we could try to use a CPU time bound instead of wall clock time
    // bound.  But these ideas are harder to implement.  We do not try to detect or handle a
    // user-specified -XX:+DisableExplicitGC.
    //
    // TODO(user): Consider using

   */
  default void awaitRunning(Duration timeout) throws TimeoutException {
    awaitRunning(toNanosSaturated(timeout), TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS);
  }

  /**
   * Waits for the {@link Service} to reach the {@linkplain State#RUNNING running state} for no more
   * than the given time.
   *
   * @param timeout the maximum time to wait
   * @param unit the time unit of the timeout argument

  public final void awaitRunning(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) throws TimeoutException {
    if (monitor.enterWhenUninterruptibly(hasReachedRunning, timeout, unit)) {
      try {
        checkCurrentState(RUNNING);
      } finally {
        monitor.leave();
      }
    } else {
      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we

   * uninterruptibly.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // concurrency
  @SuppressWarnings("GoodTime") // should accept a java.time.Duration
  public static boolean awaitUninterruptibly(CountDownLatch latch, long timeout, TimeUnit unit) {
    boolean interrupted = false;
    try {
      long remainingNanos = unit.toNanos(timeout);

          public final void awaitRunning(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) throws TimeoutException {
            delegate.awaitRunning(timeout, unit);
          }

          @Override
          public final void awaitTerminated() {
            delegate.awaitTerminated();
          }

          @Override
          public final void awaitTerminated(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) throws TimeoutException {

    clientListener.assertFailure(
      SocketTimeoutException::class.java,
      "timeout",
      "Read timed out",
    )
    assertThat(webSocket.close(1000, null)).isFalse()
  }

  /**
   * There's no read timeout when reading the first byte of a new frame. But as soon as we start
   * reading a frame we enable the read timeout. In this test we have the server returning the first
   * byte of a frame but no more frames.