* This should be the resulting ordering of plugins after merging:
     * <p>
     * Given:
     * <pre>
     * parent: X -&gt; A -&gt; B -&gt; D -&gt; E
     * child: Y -&gt; A -&gt; C -&gt; D -&gt; F
     * </pre>
     * Result:
     * <pre>
     * X -&gt; Y -&gt; A -&gt; B -&gt; C -&gt; D -&gt; E -&gt; F
     * </pre>
     */
    public static void mergePluginLists(

For example, a compiler must not invert the conditional in this program:
</p>

<pre>
*p = 1
if cond {
	*p = 2
}
</pre>

<p>
That is, the compiler must not rewrite the program into this one:
</p>

<pre>
*p = 2
if !cond {
	*p = 1
}
</pre>

<p>
If <code>cond</code> is false and another goroutine is reading <code>*p</code>,

                                <version>3.2.0</version>
                                <executions>
                                    <execution>
                                        <id>pre-clean-test</id>
                                        <phase>pre-clean</phase>
                                        <goals>
                                            <goal>clean</goal>
                                        </goals>

 * </ul>
 *
 * <h2>Usage Examples</h2>
 *
 * <h3>Check for Available Upgrades</h3>
 * <pre>{@code
 * mvnup check
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <h3>Apply All Upgrades</h3>
 * <pre>{@code
 * mvnup apply --all
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <h3>Upgrade to Maven 4.1.0 with Inference</h3>
 * <pre>{@code
 * mvnup apply --model 4.1.0 --infer
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <h2>Extension Points</h2>
 *
 * <p>To add new upgrade strategies:</p>
 * <ol>

     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0
     * </pre>

     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0
     * </pre>

     * <pre>
     * a:1.0
     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:1.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0
     * </pre>

	// Embed a "fake" exit code in the middle to check that we don't get caught on it.
	pre := "abc" + exitStr + "123def"
	text := pre + exitStr + `1`
	for i := 0; i < len(text); i++ {
		_, err := f.Write([]byte{text[i]})
		if err != nil {
			t.Fatal(err)
		}
	}

	// The "pre" output should all have been flushed already.
	if want, got := pre, out.String(); want != got {

 * set one of the following:</p>
 *
 * <h3>Option 1: Set base URL (recommended for simplicity)</h3>
 * <pre>
 * # All SP URLs will be derived from this base URL
 * saml.sp.base.url=https://your-fess-server.example.com
 * </pre>
 *
 * <h3>Option 2: Set individual SP URLs</h3>
 * <pre>
 * # SP Entity ID (Audience URI in IdP)
 * saml.sp.entityid=https://your-fess-server.example.com/sso/metadata
 *

        when(address.getHostName()).thenReturn("testhost");

        transport = new SmbTransportImpl(context, address, 445, null, 0, false);
    }

    /**
     * Test that pre-auth integrity hash is properly synchronized
     */
    @Test
    @DisplayName("Pre-auth integrity hash should be thread-safe")
    void testPreauthHashThreadSafety() throws Exception {
        // Setup SMB3.1.1 negotiation