assertEquals(2, resolvedFirst.length);
        assertEquals("user1", ((SID) resolvedFirst[0]).acctName);
        assertEquals("user2", ((SID) resolvedFirst[1]).acctName);

        // Second call with overlap should use cache for s2 and s3, requiring only s3 if not cached
        // Mark s3 unresolved to force resolve of one element
        doAnswer(inv -> {
            SID[] toResolve = inv.getArgument(2);

 *
 * Mappings Data (4,719 bytes)
 * ===========================
 *
 * This is UTF-8 character data. It is indexed into by b2b3 in the ranges dataset.
 *
 * Mappings may overlap.
 *
 * ASCII-Only
 * ==========
 *
 * Neither the section index nor the ranges data use bit 0x80 anywhere. That means the data is

            assertEquals(0x0002, Smb2Constants.SMB2_NEGOTIATE_SIGNING_REQUIRED, "Signing required flag must be 0x0002");
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Signing flags should not overlap")
        void testSigningFlagsNoOverlap() {
            assertNotEquals(Smb2Constants.SMB2_NEGOTIATE_SIGNING_ENABLED, Smb2Constants.SMB2_NEGOTIATE_SIGNING_REQUIRED,
                    "Signing flags must be distinct");

	}

	if cap(t.requestsPool) != apiRequestsMaxPerNode {
		// Only replace if needed.
		// Existing requests will use the previous limit,
		// but new requests will use the new limit.
		// There will be a short overlap window,
		// but this shouldn't last long.
		t.requestsPool = make(chan struct{}, apiRequestsMaxPerNode)
	}
	listQuorum := cfg.ListQuorum
	if listQuorum == "" {
		listQuorum = "strict"
	}

    /**
     * Returns an {@code ImmutableRangeMap} containing the associations previously added to this
     * builder.
     *
     * @throws IllegalArgumentException if any two ranges inserted into this builder overlap
     */
    public ImmutableRangeMap<K, V> build() {
      sort(entries, Range.<K>rangeLexOrdering().onKeys());
      ImmutableList.Builder<Range<K>> rangesBuilder = new ImmutableList.Builder<>(entries.size());

                if (restriction.getLowerBound() == null
                        || restriction.getLowerBound().compareTo(upperBound) < 0) {
                    throw new InvalidVersionSpecificationException("Ranges overlap: " + spec);
                }
            }
            restrictions.add(restriction);
            upperBound = restriction.getUpperBound();

            process = process.substring(index + 1).trim();

    assertLockHeld()

    // If this connection is not accepting new exchanges, we're done.
    if (calls.size >= allocationLimit || noNewExchanges) return false

    // If the non-host fields of the address don't overlap, we're done.
    if (!this.route.address.equalsNonHost(address)) return false

    // If the host exactly matches, we're done: this connection can carry the address.
    if (address.url.host ==
      this

     * Wrapper<Number>, Wrapper<Integer>, Wrapper<@Nullable Integer>, etc. If we used just
     * Equivalence<? super T> below, no type could satisfy both that bound and T's own
     * bound. With this type, they have some overlap: in our example, Equivalence<Number>
     * and Equivalence<Object>.
     */
    private final Equivalence<? super @NonNull T> equivalence;

    @ParametricNullness private final T reference;

will switch placement variation between `-start` and `-end` when\n     * the reference element overlaps its boundaries.\n     *\n     * The original placement should have a set variation.\n     */\n    flipVariations: false,\n    /**\n     * @prop {Boolean} flipVariationsByContent=false\n     * The popper will switch placement variation between `-start` and `-end` when\n     * the popper element overlaps its reference boundaries.\n     *\n     * The original placement should have a set variation.\n...

### Deployment