val sortingResult = run(":sortAcceptedApiChanges").build()
        assertEquals(TaskOutcome.SUCCESS, sortingResult.task(":sortAcceptedApiChanges")!!.outcome)

        val finalVerifyResult = run(":verifyAcceptedApiChangesOrdering").build()
        assertEquals(TaskOutcome.SUCCESS, finalVerifyResult.task(":verifyAcceptedApiChangesOrdering")!!.outcome)

        //language=JSON

//	LMOVH rreg ',' rreg
//	{
//		outcode(int($1), &$2, 0, &$4);
//	}
	MOVH	R16, R27	// 0010dc00001bdc03
	MOVHU	R1, R3		// 3023ffff

//	LMOVB rreg ',' rreg
//	{
//		outcode(int($1), &$2, 0, &$4);
//	}
	MOVB	R8, R9		// 00084e0000094e03
	MOVBU	R12, R17	// 319100ff

//	LMOVV addr ',' rreg
//	{
//		outcode(int($1), &$2, 0, &$4);
//	}
	MOVV	foo<>+3(SB), R2

          fi
      - uses: pre-commit-ci/lite-action@v1.1.0
        if: env.HAS_SECRETS == 'false'
        with:
          msg: 🎨 Auto format
      - name: Error out on pre-commit errors
        if: steps.precommit.outcome == 'failure'
        run: exit 1

  # https://github.com/marketplace/actions/alls-green#why
  pre-commit-alls-green:  # This job does nothing and is only used for the branch protection
    if: always()
    needs:

| `minio_node_ilm_action_count_delete_version_action`          | Total action outcome of lifecycle checks since server start for deleting a version                         |

    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: current-behavior
    attributes:
      label: Current Behavior (optional)
      description: Is there a way to achieve the same or similar outcome today?
    validations:
      required: false
  - type: textarea
    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context
      description: |

//	{
//		outcode($1, $2, &$3, 0, &$5);
//	}
	ADD	$1, R2
	ADD	R1<<R2, R3
	ADD	R1>>R2, R3
	ADD	R1@>R2, R3
	ADD	R1->R2, R3
	ADD	R1, R2

//
// MVN
//
//	LTYPE2 cond imsr ',' reg
//	{
//		outcode($1, $2, &$3, 0, &$5);
//	}
	CLZ	R1, R2

//
// MOVW
//
//	LTYPE3 cond gen ',' gen
//	{
//		outcode($1, $2, &$3, 0, &$5);
//	}
	MOVW.S	R1, R2
	MOVW	$1, R2
	MOVW.S	R1<<R2, R3

//

    protected
    fun assertChangesProperlyOrdered() {
        val result = run(":verifyAcceptedApiChangesOrdering").build()
        Assertions.assertEquals(TaskOutcome.SUCCESS, result.task(":verifyAcceptedApiChangesOrdering")!!.outcome)
    }

    protected
    fun assertHasMisorderedChanges(changes: List<Change>? = null) {
        val standardError = StringWriter()
        run(":verifyAcceptedApiChangesOrdering")

     * @param index    the name of the index from which to delete the suggestion
     * @param id       the ID of the suggestion to delete
     * @return a result object containing the outcome of the delete operation
     */
    SuggestWriterResult delete(Client client, SuggestSettings settings, String index, String id);

    /**
     * Deletes documents from the specified index based on the given query.
     *

     *
     * @param filterAttributes The attributes set for the filter.
     * @param fileAttributes The attributes of the mock file.
     * @param expectedResult The expected outcome of the accept method.
     * @throws SmbException If an SMB error occurs.
     */
    @ParameterizedTest(name = "Filter: {0}, File: {1}, Expected: {2}")
    @CsvSource({
            // Positive cases (should be accepted)

However, for the vast majority of issues, we aim to empower individuals to first resolve conflicts themselves, asking for help when needed, and only after that fails to escalate further. This approach gives people more control over the outcome of their dispute. 

If you are experiencing or witnessing conflict, we ask you to use the following escalation strategy to address the conflict:

1.  Address the perceived conflict directly with those involved, preferably in a