// Build up a range of surrogate pair characters to test
    int min = Character.MIN_SUPPLEMENTARY_CODE_POINT;
    int max = Character.MAX_CODE_POINT;
    int range = max - min;
    int s1 = min + (1 * range) / 4;
    int s2 = min + (2 * range) / 4;
    int s3 = min + (3 * range) / 4;
    char[] dst = new char[12];

    // Put surrogate pairs at odd indices so they can be split easily

    // Build up a range of surrogate pair characters to test
    int min = Character.MIN_SUPPLEMENTARY_CODE_POINT;
    int max = Character.MAX_CODE_POINT;
    int range = max - min;
    int s1 = min + (1 * range) / 4;
    int s2 = min + (2 * range) / 4;
    int s3 = min + (3 * range) / 4;
    char[] dst = new char[12];

    // Put surrogate pairs at odd indices so they can be split easily

  }

  /**
   * Asserts that a Unicode escaper escapes the given hi/lo surrogate pair into the expected string.
   *
   * @param escaper the non-null escaper to test
   * @param expected the expected output string
   * @param hi the high surrogate pair character
   * @param lo the low surrogate pair character
   */
  public static void assertUnicodeEscaping(

  }

  /**
   * Asserts that a Unicode escaper escapes the given hi/lo surrogate pair into the expected string.
   *
   * @param escaper the non-null escaper to test
   * @param expected the expected output string
   * @param hi the high surrogate pair character
   * @param lo the low surrogate pair character
   */
  public static void assertUnicodeEscaping(

    assertStringHash(0xb5a4be05, "ABCDefGHI\u0799", UTF_8);
    assertStringHash(0xfc5ba834, "毎月１日,毎週月曜日", UTF_8);
    assertStringHash(0x8a5c3699, "surrogate pair: \uD83D\uDCB0", UTF_8);

    assertStringHash(0, "", UTF_16LE);
    assertStringHash(0x288418e4, "k", UTF_16LE);
    assertStringHash(0x5a0cb7c3, "hell", UTF_16LE);
    assertStringHash(0xd7c31989, "hello", UTF_16LE);

 * because of the possibility of splitting a surrogate pair. The only case in which it is safe to
 * escape strings and concatenate the results is if you can rule out this possibility, either by
 * splitting an existing long string into short strings adaptively around {@linkplain
 * Character#isHighSurrogate surrogate} {@linkplain Character#isLowSurrogate pairs}, or by starting

    return new String(array);
  }

  /**
   * Returns the longest string {@code prefix} such that {@code a.toString().startsWith(prefix) &&
   * b.toString().startsWith(prefix)}, taking care not to split surrogate pairs. If {@code a} and
   * {@code b} have no common prefix, returns the empty string.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  public static String commonPrefix(CharSequence a, CharSequence b) {
    checkNotNull(a);

        }
      } else {
        // and everything else is replaced with FFFD.
        assertEscaping(xmlEscaper, "\uFFFD", ch);
      }
    }

    // Test _all_ allowed characters (including surrogate values).
    for (char ch = 0x20; ch <= 0xFFFD; ch++) {
      // There are a small number of cases to consider, so just do it manually.
      if (ch == '&') {
        assertEscaping(xmlEscaper, "&amp;", ch);

   * for use with it (such as all-ASCII text) and for simple debugging text. When using this method,
   * consider the following:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>it may split surrogate pairs
   *   <li>it may split characters and combining characters
   *   <li>it does not consider word boundaries
   *   <li>if truncating for display to users, there are other considerations that must be taken

    }
  }

  /**
   * This verifies that putUnencodedChars(String) and hashUnencodedChars(String) are equivalent,
   * even for funny strings composed by (possibly unmatched, and mostly illegal) surrogate
   * characters. (But doesn't test that they do the right thing - just their consistency).
   */
  private static void assertHashStringWithSurrogatesEquivalence(
      HashFunction hashFunction, Random random) {