assertThrows(
        IllegalArgumentException.class,
        () -> ContiguousSet.create(range, UNBOUNDED_THROWING_DOMAIN));
  }

  public void testCreate_noMax() {
    Range<Integer> range = Range.greaterThan(0);
    assertThrows(
        IllegalArgumentException.class,
        () -> ContiguousSet.create(range, UNBOUNDED_THROWING_DOMAIN));
  }

  public void testCreate_empty() {

        responseBodyEnd.bytesRead,
        responseBodyBytes,
      )
    } else {
      assertThat(listener.recordedEventTypes()).doesNotContain(ResponseBodyEnd::class)
    }
  }

  private fun greaterThan(value: Long): Matcher<Long?> =
    object : BaseMatcher<Long?>() {
      override fun describeTo(description: Description?) {
        description!!.appendText("> $value")
      }

 *
 * {@snippet :
 * ContiguousSet.closed(5, 42)
 * }
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> Be extremely careful what you do with conceptually large instances (such as
 * {@code ContiguousSet.create(Range.greaterThan(0), DiscreteDomain.integers()}). Certain operations
 * on such a set can be performed efficiently, but others (such as {@link Set#hashCode} or {@link
 * Collections#frequency}) can cause major performance problems.
 *

 *
 * {@snippet :
 * ContiguousSet.closed(5, 42)
 * }
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> Be extremely careful what you do with conceptually large instances (such as
 * {@code ContiguousSet.create(Range.greaterThan(0), DiscreteDomain.integers()}). Certain operations
 * on such a set can be performed efficiently, but others (such as {@link Set#hashCode} or {@link
 * Collections#frequency}) can cause major performance problems.
 *

    assertEquals(map, Maps.subMap(map, Range.greaterThan(0)));
    assertEquals(ImmutableSortedMap.of(6, 0, 8, 0, 10, 0), Maps.subMap(map, Range.greaterThan(4)));
    assertEquals(ImmutableSortedMap.of(8, 0, 10, 0), Maps.subMap(map, Range.greaterThan(7)));
    assertEquals(empty, Maps.subMap(map, Range.greaterThan(20)));

    assertEquals(empty, Maps.subMap(map, Range.lessThan(0)));

    assertEquals(map, Maps.subMap(map, Range.greaterThan(0)));
    assertEquals(ImmutableSortedMap.of(6, 0, 8, 0, 10, 0), Maps.subMap(map, Range.greaterThan(4)));
    assertEquals(ImmutableSortedMap.of(8, 0, 10, 0), Maps.subMap(map, Range.greaterThan(7)));
    assertEquals(empty, Maps.subMap(map, Range.greaterThan(20)));

    assertEquals(empty, Maps.subMap(map, Range.lessThan(0)));

  @Override
  int hashCode();

  /**
   * Returns a readable string representation of this range set. For example, if this {@code
   * RangeSet} consisted of {@code Range.closed(1, 3)} and {@code Range.greaterThan(4)}, this might
   * return {@code " [1..3](4..+∞)}"}.
   */
  @Override
  String toString();

//           value: image/* # match objects with 'content-type', all values starting with 'image/'
//       size:
//         lessThan: "10MiB" # match objects with size less than this value (e.g. 10MiB)
//         greaterThan: 1MiB # match objects with size greater than this value (e.g. 1MiB)
//       purge:
//           # retainVersions: 0 # (default) delete all versions of the object. This option is the fastest.

   * ranges {@code [3..3)} and {@code [4..4)}.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> Be extremely careful what you do with the {@code asSet} view of a large
   * range set (such as {@code ImmutableRangeSet.of(Range.greaterThan(0))}). Certain operations on
   * such a set can be performed efficiently, but others (such as {@link Set#hashCode} or {@link
   * Collections#frequency}) can cause major performance problems.
   *

def test_path_param_gt_2():
    response = client.get("/path/param-gt/2")
    assert response.status_code == 422
    assert response.json() == {
        "detail": [
            {
                "type": "greater_than",
                "loc": ["path", "item_id"],
                "msg": "Input should be greater than 3",
                "input": "2",
                "ctx": {"gt": 3.0},
            }
        ]
    }